To maintainer of package "audacious"

[Timo Aaltonen]

On Wed, 7 May 2008, Cory K. wrote:

> Timo Aaltonen wrote:
>> On Wed, 7 May 2008, Cory K. wrote:
>>>> don't know about any broken EQ, never used one since they are useless.
>>>
>>> It's broken in a similar manor as the Gstreamer one is. (which was
>>> disabled instead of fixed) Just enable the EQ. Set a curve then play
>>> some music. Its as if the preamp is set to high.
>>>
>>> And yeah. I'm sure people with crappy equipment find EQing useless.
>>> Sounds bad no matter what you do.;)
>>
>> I always thought it's the other way around.. EQ:s made to get a "bass
>> boost" or whatever :)
>>
>>
>> /me goes back to listen his collection of ~4500 flac's using a pair of
>> crappy old Sennheiser HD600's :)
>>
>
> Ok. Since I'm rather comfortable with the size of my "e-penis" I won't
> turn this into a competition. ;)

heh :)

> In any case, I'm grabbing their latest code to see if it's been fixed
> upstream. Seems a shame to go through a SRU to "fix" something that
> isn't broken and not try to fix something that is if we can.

Well, PulseAudio is used by default and users are baffled because 
audacious remains silent... I'd say that is a bug.


t