Stable Release Update Regression/Build Problem

Scott Kitterman ubuntu at kitterman.com
Wed Jun 25 03:21:42 BST 2008


On Tuesday 24 June 2008 13:41, Scott Kitterman wrote:

> I think I have a sense of it.  I'll work up a diff and run it by the other
> members of motu-sru, ubuntu-sru, and the sru-verification teams.
>
> Scott K

As promised, here is the diff I propose.  I'd appreciate concurrence from 
members of the above teams.  Comments from anyone are welcome too.

--- sru 2008-06-24 22:15:10.000000000 -0400
+++ sru.new     2008-06-24 22:17:59.000000000 -0400
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-The [WWW] SRU verification team will regularly check open bugs with the 
verification-needed tag and test proposed updates on different hardware to 
check for inadvertent side effects.
+The [WWW] SRU verification team will regularly check open bugs with the 
verification-needed tag and test proposed updates on different hardware to 
check for inadvertent side effects.  Verification must be done in a software 
environment as close as is feasible to that which will exist after the 
package is copied to *-updates for.  Generally this will be with a system 
that is up to date from *-release, *-security, and *-updates, but not other 
packages from *-proposed.

 If they discover that your fix is insufficient, or the test case is not 
sufficient to reproduce the bug, they will:

If there are no objections from the relevant teams, I'll update the wiki page 
with a suitably wikified version of this.

Scott K



More information about the Ubuntu-motu mailing list