NEW Packages process
Soren Hansen
soren at ubuntu.com
Wed Apr 16 23:14:14 BST 2008
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 02:40:51PM +0200, Daniel Holbach wrote:
> If I submitted a package, had to wait weeks to get it reviewed, then
> got a reply "please fix this triviality" I wasn't sure if I made it my
> first priority to come up with a fix.
What if inclusion in the final release was dependent on certain things
being fixed? That would be quite an incentive to make sure it got fixed,
I think. Kind of like broken packages in Debian can be removed from
testing (and hence will never be in stable), while staying in unstable.
--
Soren Hansen |
Virtualisation specialist | Ubuntu Server Team
Canonical Ltd. | http://www.ubuntu.com/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-motu/attachments/20080417/073ea736/attachment.pgp
More information about the Ubuntu-motu
mailing list