Proposing changes to multimedia stack
stefan.potyra at informatik.uni-erlangen.de
Tue Nov 20 16:13:55 GMT 2007
Am Dienstag, 20. November 2007 16:51 schrieb Mario Limonciello:
> The other day John Dong and I were talking on IRC about the current
> situation with ffmpeg. There are two versions of ffmpeg (and some related
> applications) out there: one on our archive and one on medibuntu. The one
> on medibuntu is the same source package as the one in our archive but it is
> built with encoders.
> Personally I think its really unfortunate to have to do it this way. It
> seems like the exact reason that we have an area like multiverse. Several
> ffmpeg and lame based projects already live there.
> John had said he thinks the plan was to eventually move ffmpeg into main,
> so there wouldn't be much expectation to move it from universe to
> multiverse and just turn everything on. To this I proposed that we would
> modify the source package for ffmpeg to generate binaries twice. The free
> binaries could end up in universe or main whereas the non free would end up
> in multiverse.
hm... I have heard that a universe source package could generate binaries for
both universe and multiverse, but I'm quite sure that it's not possible to
have a multiverse source package generate a main binary. So that would
probably mean that the patent encumbered source would (once ffmpeg moves to
main) reside in main, not too sure if that's ok.
> In order to avoid confusion and the necessity of using Replaces/Conflicts,
> a third virtual package binary that depends on either the free | non-free
> variant can also be generated.
Sorry I don't understand this right now. What would that virtual package
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-motu/attachments/20071120/e65bde5a/attachment-0001.pgp
More information about the Ubuntu-motu