Guidelines for reviewing new packages.

[Scott Kitterman]

On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 20:13:45 -0600 "Justin Dugger" <jldugger at gmail.com> 
wrote:
>On Nov 12, 2007 4:34 PM, Emmet Hikory <persia at ubuntu.com> wrote:
>> Emmet Hikory wrote:
>> 1: 
http://kitenet.net/~joey/blog/entry/dpatch_dbs_etc_etc_etc_etc_considered_harmful/
>
>On a longer term basis, did any progress come out of UDS-Boston on
>moving the entire archive in bazaar?

No.  There was pretty strong opposition from at least myself and no 
argument for it that I heard.  At this point I think it's useful for 
smaller teams where there is consensus to use it.  In MOTU woith 20,000 
packages it's just not feasible.

>It sounds like it sort of solves much of both problems.

I'm not sure what you mean.  I think it makes patch systems even more 
critical because you don't typically keep the upstream tarball in the VCS.

Scott K