Guidelines for reviewing new packages.

[Stefan Potyra]

Hi,

Am Montag 12 November 2007 20:38:19 schrieb Jeffrey Ratcliffe:
> On 12/11/2007, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort  wrote:
> >      4b.  Contents of diff.gz should be in debian/. i.e. no inline
> > patching.
>
> Absolutely. Especially if there are patches on patches, anything else
> makes things really hard for anybody to follow.

Personally I don't like patch systems too much.

Apart from my personal preference though, there is also the limitation that 
you cannot change the upstream clean rule with patches without producing 
really ugly debian/rules.

Speaking of patches on patches: you can get these only with a patch system :P.

Cheers,
    Stefan.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-motu/attachments/20071112/9bb37d37/attachment.pgp