libvlc0-dev problem

[Ouattara Oumar Aziz]

Daniel T. Chen a écrit :
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Ouattara Oumar Aziz wrote:
>> I believe you didn't get my problem.
> 
> No, I believe you didn't understand my response. :)
> 
> 1) There's no "libmux" string in that diff.gz _at all_. No string, no
> reference, no possible way of stating that libmux is associated with
> libvlc0-dev from the Debian packaging that Ubuntu inherits.
> 
> 2) In 7.04:
> crimsun at garnish:~$ apt-file search libmux
> vlc-nox: usr/lib/vlc/mux/libmux_asf_plugin.so
> vlc-nox: usr/lib/vlc/mux/libmux_avi_plugin.so
> vlc-nox: usr/lib/vlc/mux/libmux_dummy_plugin.so
> vlc-nox: usr/lib/vlc/mux/libmux_mp4_plugin.so
> vlc-nox: usr/lib/vlc/mux/libmux_mpjpeg_plugin.so
> vlc-nox: usr/lib/vlc/mux/libmux_ogg_plugin.so
> vlc-nox: usr/lib/vlc/mux/libmux_ps_plugin.so
> vlc-nox: usr/lib/vlc/mux/libmux_wav_plugin.so
> crimsun at garnish:~$ apt-file search libmux_ts
> crimsun at garnish:~$
> 
> In other words, I'm not sure where you're pulling the information for
> libmux_ts.a, but it's surely not from 7.04's repositories. And since we
> only actively develop 7.04, the previous releases are not relevant here.
> 
>> - why is my system saying that that *libmux* file exists in a package 
>> when it doesn't ? I believe apt-file can't just imagine that. Since it 
>> told me that the file were in libvlc0-dev, it may be written somewhere.
> 
> Check your sources.list(5), perhaps? [Again, all repos not hosted by
> Ubuntu mirrors _and_ not 7.04 are irrelevant.]
> 
>> - I know that lib can be found on vlc website. So it's not impossible 
>> that the package could contain them if we choose to.
> 
> So please file a wishlist bug using Launchpad to include said file.
> 
>> On an other hand, there is also a lib *libfaad.a* that has the same 
>> problem, but libfaad.a can be found in libfaad2-dev package. So was the 
>> choice of removing all the *.a files from lbvlc0-dev to prevent some 
>> conflict ?
> 
> Again, Ubuntu inherits the Debian packaging. Your question regarding
> original intent is better posed in that forum.
> 
>> if so, any of the *.a files should be provide in some other packages and 
>> the problem of that description stuff should be fixed.
> 
> There is _no_ "description stuff" in the official 7.04 libvlc0-dev
> package that refers to any "libmux".
> 
> Thanks,

OK, Thanks. I guess I should file a bug in launchpad since I am on Edgy 
(6.10). I thought I should refer to you when seeing the the maintainer 
was Ubuntu-MOTU.

Thanks a lot for your help :) .

wattazoum