Future of REVU and Debian Mentors
ubuntu at kitterman.com
Fri Aug 3 07:43:34 BST 2007
On Friday 03 August 2007 02:15, Emmet Hikory wrote:
> On 8/3/07, Scott Kitterman <ubuntu at kitterman.com> wrote:
> > On revu, this is all done by dput revu .....
> Well, no. #1 & #2 are currently done in LP, with the current
> process. #3 is currently `dput revu ...`, whereas I'm suggesting
> `dput ppa ...`, which doesn't seem that different.
OK. Is was not quite correct, but adding the LP business is a recent change
and a mistake in my opinion. If there's a needs-packaging bug, the packager
can assign it to themselves, but that's all that really needs doing in LP.
LP is stunningly slow as web pages go. I find it extremely frustrating. I'm
learning the mail interface, but as a web based service I find it almost
unusable. Pushing more towards LP is just going to make reviewing harder and
take longer. I am convinced.
More information about the Ubuntu-motu