Stable Release Updates policy

Stefan Potyra sistpoty at
Tue Nov 7 18:46:14 GMT 2006

Hi Daniel,

Am Dienstag 07 November 2006 04:31 schrieb Daniel Holbach:
> Hello everybody,
> I'm going to add our process to
> soon. Can you all check
> that the 'proposal' part of
> is ok?

erm... looks like we got two pages now:


whereas the latter is quite elaborate already.

While trying to look at the differences, imo it makes more sense that the 
sru-team acks the upload to -proposed. Otherwise an reject fro the sru-team 
would mean that the whole testing process was useless and would have to be 

Also I like the idea to have a separate sru-bug which summarizes the bugs the 
update is involved. That way, there is a clearer distinction between the 
discussion about a particular bug and the discussion about the sru itself. 
See [1] and [2] for an example.

What's unclear yet is what quorum the sru-team has. Since we have 4 members, I 
propose a quorum of 3. If this doesn't work out, we can still lower it to 2.

Btw.: It would be good to have a final policy soonish, since there are already 
SRU-requests pending:

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : 

More information about the Ubuntu-motu mailing list