UVF exception for ipython-0.7.0-2

[Stephan Hermann]

hi,

On Saturday 21 January 2006 23:45, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> I just had a serious talk with the ipython maintainer of ipython. He is
> currently preparing version 0.7.0-2 for debian, and thinks that version
> should be in dapper. We did some investigation and found that the merge
> for the previous version was botched, so something has to be done
> anyway.

Well, the patch he was talking about was introduced in hoary from doko.
I don't actually know anymore, if the patch was in the upstream version of 
debian, during the merge period.

So, Norbert shouldn't complain so loud, because he never mentiond the upstream 
change in his changelog.

This is the changelog of the hoary version:

ipython (0.6.10-0ubuntu1) hoary; urgency=low

  * New upstream version.
  * Conditionally import the profiler code.
  * Suggest the python-profiler package.

 -- Matthias Klose <doko at ubuntu.com>  Sat, 12 Feb 2005 15:52:51 +0100

ipython (0.6.5-1ubuntu1) hoary; urgency=low

  * Rebuild for python2.4.

 -- Matthias Klose <m at klose.in-berlin.de>  Thu, 16 Dec 2004 16:24:06 +0100



this is the changelog of the breezy version from 0.6.10-0ubuntu1 on:

ipython (0.6.15-1ubuntu2) breezy; urgency=low

  * Made the python 2.4 package the default one (i.e. Depend the metapackage
    on the 2.4 package)
  * Removed python 2.2 packages as we don't support python 2.2 anymore

 -- Sebastian Dröge <slomo at ubuntu.com>  Sat, 10 Sep 2005 15:08:53 +0200

ipython (0.6.15-1ubuntu1) breezy; urgency=low

  * Resynchronise with Debian.

 -- Stephan Hermann <sh at sourcecode.de>  Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:01:11 +0200

ipython (0.6.15-1) unstable; urgency=low

  * New upstream release.

 -- Norbert Tretkowski <nobse at debian.org>  Thu,  2 Jun 2005 23:51:45 +0200

ipython (0.6.14-1) unstable; urgency=low

  * New upstream release.

 -- Norbert Tretkowski <nobse at debian.org>  Tue, 31 May 2005 22:53:25 +0200

ipython (0.6.13-1) unstable; urgency=low

  * New upstream release.
  * Removed backported patch which was added in 0.6.12-3 to fix misleading
    prompt, it's part of this release.

 -- Norbert Tretkowski <nobse at debian.org>  Fri, 15 Apr 2005 09:42:35 +0200

ipython (0.6.12-4) unstable; urgency=medium

  * Re-added python build-dependency, it got lost in 0.6.12-2.
    (closes: #301636)

 -- Norbert Tretkowski <nobse at debian.org>  Sun, 27 Mar 2005 14:28:26 +0200

ipython (0.6.12-3) unstable; urgency=low

  * Added a new patch from cvs to fix misleading prompt2. (closes: #300847)

 -- Norbert Tretkowski <nobse at debian.org>  Sun, 27 Mar 2005 00:05:26 +0100

ipython (0.6.12-2) unstable; urgency=low

  * Added packages for python2.2 and python2.4, ipython package is now a dummy
    package depending on ipython built for Debians default python.
    (closes: #292537)
  * Split out generic files into separate ipython-common package.
  * Enhanced package descriptions.
  * Removed CFLAGS settings from debian/rules, not required.
  * Tweaked message displayed when profiler support is missing.
  * Suggest the python-profiler package.

 -- Norbert Tretkowski <nobse at debian.org>  Fri, 25 Mar 2005 20:24:36 +0100

ipython (0.6.12-1) unstable; urgency=low

  * New upstream release.
  * Removed patch which was added in 0.6.5-1.1 to make profiling support
    optional, it was merged upstream.

 -- Norbert Tretkowski <nobse at debian.org>  Wed,  2 Mar 2005 12:15:09 +0100

ipython (0.6.11-1) unstable; urgency=low

  * New upstream release.
    + Fixed broken profiling support unless -D is specified. (closes: #295779)
  * Acknowledged NMUs. (closes: #206653, #294500, #294861, #280505)
  * New co-maintainer, added myself to uploaders.

 -- Norbert Tretkowski <nobse at debian.org>  Tue,  1 Mar 2005 12:40:33 +0100

0.6.10-0ubuntu1 was never released by debian.

Actually, I honestly don't know anymore, why the changelog for breezy wasn't 
containing the changes from ubuntu. But there are only two reasons why:
MoM output was bugged, or I wasn't paying enough attention to the changelog 
diff.


> The patch to the package is quite small, only the default python would
> need to changed. If I get approval, I'll handly this shortly

Well, and the python 2.2 package has to be removed from the dapper package. 

It would be easier, if Norbert just had ask me, because he shout out loud that 
he read the changelog 
(http://www.inittab.de/blog/2006/01/21#20060121_ubuntu-did-it-again), but 
never bothered to ask, when he didn't understand it. Actually that would be 
the action I would take.

But for me it would be ok, when we know what exactly changed in the upcoming 
release.

Regards,
\sh