Introduction and a couple of questions
bdrung at ubuntu.com
Mon Feb 15 23:50:30 GMT 2010
Am Montag, den 15.02.2010, 18:43 -0500 schrieb Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 6:19 PM, Benjamin Drung <bdrung at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> > I use this one:
> > lintian -IE --pedantic --color=auto <source package>*.changes
> Thanks for bringing it up, I had forgotten that lintian could give
> colored reports :)
> To be entirely truthful, I also use --pedantic... I figured it was a
> little misleading if starting out though - I thought there were some
> things reported which one should probably not worry too much about,
> and I am proved wrong.
> For example:
> P: colormath source: direct-changes-in-diff-but-no-patch-system LICENSE
> P: colormath: no-upstream-changelog
> I certainly can't say that either should never be fixed, but they're a
> little tricky. In this particular case, LICENSE shouldn't be added in
> the source, and it's a very valid issue. However, I find that
> no-upstream-changelog is very frequent. The latter is probably not a
> blocker for uploading, but both require upstream intervention more
> than a change in the packaging itself.
That's why it is called pedantic. pedantic shouldn't be a blocker.
no-upstream-changelog is the only pedantic tag that I ignore in most
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer (www.debian.org)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-motu-mentors/attachments/20100216/d03b21fc/attachment.pgp
More information about the Ubuntu-motu-mentors