[Ubuntu-l10n-eng] Expanding the scope of the en-GB translation

[Sridhar Dhanapalan]

On Sunday 20 August 2006 20:25, William Anderson <neuro at well.com> wrote:
> Sridhar Dhanapalan wrote:
> > On Saturday 19 August 2006 23:25, Toby Smithe <toby.smithe at gmail.com> 
wrote:
> >> Also, I noticed that this list doesn't have a Reply-To header which
> >> points to ubuntu-l10n-eng at lists.ubuntu.com, which is a bit annoying when
> >> clicking "reply".
> >
> > The reason why we don't do this is explained here:
> >
> >   http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
>
> Are we really going to have *this* argument?  What's it like back in 2002?
> :(
>
> Anyway, http://www.metasystema.net/essays/reply-to.mhtml

Okay, you win :)

Until a few months ago, I was a proponent of Reply-To header munging. Some 
sysadmin friends convinced me otherwise, but nowadays I don't feel too 
strongly either way. There seems to be some demand for header munging, so I 
have implemented it. We'll see how it goes.

-- 
Sridhar Dhanapalan
  {GnuPG/OpenPGP: http://www.dhanapalan.com/yama.asc
   0x049D38B4 : A7A9 8A02 78CB AB1B FCE4 EEC6 2DD9 249B 049D 38B4}

"We are making steadfast progress."
	- US President George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., 2003-06-09
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-l10n-eng/attachments/20060823/7fd3a8b1/attachment.pgp