<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
On 01/03/11 10:51, Isapual Daily wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:SNT112-W263A09C77939971DB5ABE0B6C10@phx.gbl"
type="cite">
<style>.hmmessage p { margin: 0px; padding: 0px; }body.hmmessage { font-size: 10pt; font-family: Tahoma; }</style>
So now the Gestapo have there own private channel?<br>
</blockquote>
yay, Godwin's law has been reached, convention dictates at this
point the conversation is over and you lost it<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:SNT112-W263A09C77939971DB5ABE0B6C10@phx.gbl"
type="cite">
How sweet, NOT!!!<br>
</blockquote>
good use of the exclamation mark, three times as effective as just
the one.<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:SNT112-W263A09C77939971DB5ABE0B6C10@phx.gbl"
type="cite">
Don't you guys know how to use the power button?<br>
Most normal peeps know how to get up and walk away when they don't
like something.<br>
This place is out of hand with the rules!!!!<br>
</blockquote>
Four!!!!<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:SNT112-W263A09C77939971DB5ABE0B6C10@phx.gbl"
type="cite">
If it's too HOT in the kitchen, get the heck out.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Personally I anticipate such a channel to be rarely used, and
conversations within it to be rather dull. Nobody involved likes
secrecy, everyone likes openness, I normally avoid channels without
public logs. If it turns into a conversation hotspot I would expect
the channel to be closed. <br>
<br>
Alan.<br>
</body>
</html>