Privacy issues in Ubuntu's IRC channels and Launchpad

[Tm_T]

Price, I actually think we agree more than you realise: I believe too
it's pretty much all or nothing, thus the discussion should be done in
way greater context than just this particular case.

On 27 September 2013 12:21, Joseph Price <pricechild at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> I'm not sure I agree Tm_T...
>
> "Should you publish logs of your channel" is an important decision to be
> made. I also see it as a binary decision. I think you can either publish
> everything or nothing.
>
> Consider a world where we decided that logs would be published but there
> would be a mechanism for individuals to remove their contributions from it.
> What would you propose we do with the following exchange from #ubuntu-ops:
>
> 130903T184144<+IdleOne> All over a t-shirt
> 130903T184335<+Pricey> IdleOne: This was a question about t shirts?
> 130903T184358<+IdleOne> Pricey: yes, one that had nothing to do with #ubuntu
> at that.
>
> If I wanted my line removed... would you also propose we should remove lines
> like IdleOne's second? It's a pretty strong inference that I was involved
> with the discussion. It's also pretty easy to infer what I said.
>
> If you do, then I challenge anyone to find a system that could automate that
> process. (I'm known as 'price' in some places which is quite a common
> word... yay for more ambiguity and false positives)
> If you don't then what's the point in me requesting removal of my own line?
>
> If it is decided to publish logs then I believe that everyone should be
> informed. Ubuntu does this with the ChanServ entrymsg.
>
> Pricey
>
>
> On 27 September 2013 06:23, Tm_T <tmt at ubuntu.com> wrote:
>>
>> I strongly feel that "should we log at all" is separate discussion
>> from the matter at hand.
>>
>> I'm with Alan Bell on how we should proceed with this particular case.
>>
>> On 27 September 2013 02:26, Jason A. Ribeiro <jason at jrib.net> wrote:
>> > For what it's worth, I have searched logs in the past because I knew the
>> > issue had come up before and couldn't remember the resolution.  While
>> > the
>> > information is not in an optimal format, the logs have still been useful
>> > to
>> > me.
>> >
>> > Jason (jrib)
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 3:29 PM, <hatearchives at openmailbox.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Umm no. Just no.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 2013-09-26 21:25, Alan Bell wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Google rates new and interesting stuff above old dull
>> >>> stuff, I would recommend doing more stuff that Google can see where
>> >>> you demonstrate your awesomeness to the world, so that when people
>> >>> Google for your nick they find all the new awesome stuff and the older
>> >>> less linked to things will fall down the index.
>> >>>
>> >>> Alan.
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> I work at http://libertus.co.uk
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Ubuntu-irc mailing list
>> >> Ubuntu-irc at lists.ubuntu.com
>> >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-irc
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Ubuntu-irc mailing list
>> > Ubuntu-irc at lists.ubuntu.com
>> > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-irc
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Tm_T, Jussi Kekkonen
>>   Ubuntu/KDE developer  tmt at ubuntu.com
>>
>> --
>> Ubuntu-irc mailing list
>> Ubuntu-irc at lists.ubuntu.com
>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-irc
>
>
>
> --
> Ubuntu-irc mailing list
> Ubuntu-irc at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-irc
>



-- 
Tm_T, Jussi Kekkonen
  Ubuntu/KDE developer  tmt at ubuntu.com