Proposal: Ubuntu Operator channel changes

[Carl Karsten]

On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 7:25 AM, Jussi Schultink <jussi01 at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> Hei all,
>
> Thanks for your valuable feedback.
>
> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Sarah Hobbs <hobbsee at ubuntu.com> wrote:
>> On 08/11/10 08:51, Juha Siltala wrote:
>>
>>> a private channel for discussion and negotiation internal to the
>>> team
>>
>>> Internal disputes will be much easier to handle in a private channel,
>>> where no-one is "saving face", unnecessarily defensive or otherwise
>>> uncomfortable with publicity for asking "dumb" questions from their
>>> peers or arguing with them.

+1

>>
>> Having seen this in existence before, I would strongly advise that this
>> channel be logged, but these logs only be available to the CC.  That
>> way, if there are any accusations of improper conduct, the higher body
>> is able to look into the situation.

-1

I think it adds a complication that isn't necessary.  The "improper
conduct" will have occurred in a public channel which is logged; so
that is what will be reviewed.  I don't see much value (before
deducting the cost) in the logs of the private channel, and managing
who has access to them seems like way too much trouble.

>
>>
>> That satisfies both the goal of being accountable, and not giving trolls
>> ammunition against the op team.
>>
>
> Are there any other thoughts on this new setup proposal?
>
> Jussi
>
>> Hobbsee
>>
>> --
>> Ubuntu-irc mailing list
>> Ubuntu-irc at lists.ubuntu.com
>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-irc
>>
>
> --
> Ubuntu-irc mailing list
> Ubuntu-irc at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-irc
>



-- 
Carl K