general attitude for -ops, how we are expected to behave

Michael Lustfield mtecknology at ubuntu.com
Mon Feb 15 07:51:59 UTC 2010


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Isn't there @mark in the Bantracker that would suffice perfectly for
this? Not only inform other ops but also give detail in the ban logs if
a ban does come up. That's what my impression of @mark was for.

On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 07:42:48 +0000
Paul O'Malley - gnu's not unix - <ompaul at eircom.net> wrote:

> Joseph Price wrote:
> > On 14 February 2010 10:56, Terence Simpson <tsimpson at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> >> I know we are all human and we do make mistakes
> >> or have bad days.
> > 
> > Indeed, we are all human. Just like all the other users.... yes we're users too!
> > 
> > Assume the best.
> > 
> > 
> >> I'm not proposing that we are forced to be cheery all
> >> the time, and are fired out of a cannon when we fail. But we should all
> >> make an effort to be considerate and lead by example.
> > 
> > If you don't want to spend the time dealing with situations, trying to
> > keep everyone happy, then don't. Let someone else do it.
> > 
> > "Oh I don't have enough time" is no excuse to just banforward someone
> > before signing off. If you don't have the time to talk with someone,
> > leave it alone.
> > 
> 
> 
> This is wrong, if you have not gotten the idea already, there is baiting 
> and organised baiting, for instance I used to do some stuff on a 
> Saturday morning early local time. I would be the only person there for 
> a couple of hours. If your primary objective is not create a functional 
>   support channel, then what is it?
> 
> 
> When you are on the way out why not do a
> "Mark usernam #Channel-wheretheywere" in #ubuntu-ops.
> 
> Perhaps if it had been building over time then the -1 hour or -3 hours 
> then that could be included.
> 
> As others have the rights to remove bans set by another op. A cold light 
> of day approach can be taken by reflecting on the logs at that time
> 
> Anything else is burnout for people who are trying to keep channels 
> functional.
> (No idea how I would know this.)
> 


- -- 
Michael Lustfield
Kalliki Software

Network and Systems Administrator
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkt4/R8ACgkQ3y7Nst6YLGWVOwCdHPFbmNZ1e2KTWtY30A4OlWHy
fNkAni4WEBeVSmqXYp7lGj+YgRmYd0Gc
=O8vF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the Ubuntu-irc mailing list