#ubuntu-ops policy discussion

[Vantrax]

A users right to have a private discussions about an issue of concern (that
may involve his or another persons behavior) should be respected. There is
no valid reason a user should have to be publicly (or reasonably publicly)
humiliated in order to resolve an issue.

Transparency is not a good enough reason.

General discussion without specifics should be public though. That someone
is baned as a result of XY behaviour that is in violation of the Ubuntu Code
of Conduct, or that a ban was overturned because of Z should be public.

-Matthew Lye

You can do anything you set your mind to when you have vision,
determination, and and endless supply of expendable labor.
<No trees were harmed during this transmission. However, a great number of
electrons were terribly inconvenienced>


On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 10:33 AM, Melissa Draper <melissa at meldraweb.com>wrote:

> On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 11:00 -0600, Carl Karsten wrote:
> > I can see a desire for a user wanting privacy, but that is at odds
> > with transparency, and transparency wins.
>
> No. No, it does not. Nor should it.
>
> --
> Melissa Draper
>
> w: http://meldraweb.com & http://geekosophical.net
> p: +61 4 0472 2736
>
>
> --
> Ubuntu-irc mailing list
> Ubuntu-irc at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-irc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-irc/attachments/20100202/995f23a9/attachment.html>