#ubuntu-ops policy discussion

[Lasse Havelund]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 01/02/2010 20:17, Joseph Price wrote:
> On 1 February 2010 18:53, Jussi Schultink <jussi01 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I very much see #ubuntu-ops as a dispute resolution channel, for
>> bans and such.
> We've always been told this doesn't work. I now agree.

In what sense doesn't the channel works? Issues are resolved, bans are
discussed and moderated, and ops give heads-up to other operators if a
potential issue is appearing in one of the channels.

I think it works exactly according to the intention Jussi described.

> #ubuntu-irc sucks... its rubbish... it doesn't do much.

I see #ubuntu-irc primarily as a contact point for LoCo channel
discussion/management. Granted, not much happens, but wouldn't that just
imply that the individual LoCo channels are handling their own problems?
I don't see exactly what you mean by "it's rubbish, it doesn't do much".

> You aren't willing to entertain discussion on any other options? Such
> as what I suggested above?

I can only speak for myself, but I think the two ideas Jussi suggested
(or similar ideas) are the best approaches to the situation, for the
same reasons I, and several others, outlined at yesterday's meeting.

- -- 
  .----.-.     Lasse Havelund
 /    ( o \    Official Ubuntu Member
'|  __ ` ||    lhavelund at ubuntu.com
 |||  ||| -'   +45 6021 3890
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAktnaZMACgkQ1EajTqQ6QOs/JQCfTItGtGJGSw9kRQvg7ljxDF07
+/UAn1TFrxZlKZRQ+WsliUVtnLWeYznD
=FpaC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----