#ubuntu-ops policy discussion

[John Vivirito]

On 02/01/10 14:21, Joseph Price wrote:
> On 1 February 2010 18:49, John Vivirito <gnomefreak at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 2. Get a private, non-logged discussion channel for ops. You don't
>>> need to publically log your 'private messages'. Nobody should expect
>>> everything to be public. Get a channel people know exists.
>>> Transparency only needs to go so far. Talk about stuff there when
>>> advice etc is needed. Talk about currently happenning situations. Just
>>> be prepared to (publically) justify any public actions you make based
>>> on what is discussed there.. That's where we get transparency.
>> I like this idea. i noticed we have 2. Is there an objection
>> to use #ubuntu-irc for general/offtopic/non ops official
>> channel. Use -ops to handle user problems and use -irc for non
>> ops topics?
> 
> #something-ops is a recognised name. I'd suggest that be the 'open'
> channel for general discussion. Its what people would expect.
> 
That works the only reason i suggested -irc is because im not
real sure why its there.

-- 
Sincerely Yours,
    John Vivirito

https://launchpad.net/~gnomefreak
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/JohnVivirito
Linux User# 414246

"How can i get lost, if i have no where to go"
    -- Metallica from Unforgiven III

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-irc/attachments/20100201/0e8b5378/attachment.pgp>