mez at ubuntu.com
Thu Jul 24 19:43:35 UTC 2008
On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 19:52 +0100, Joseph Price wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 19:47 +0100, Martin Meredith wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 18:16 +0100, Joseph Price wrote:
> > > Announced at the latest ubuntu-irc meeting that we are going to be going
> > > through the process of electing some new council members.
> > >
> > > The process I outlined at the meeting was only an idea, and I think I
> > > tried to put across the message that I would be writing it to this ML
> > > when decided on, including deadlines. (My fault if I didn't make this
> > > clear enough)
> > >
> > > We're just talking with the CC atm to work out the finer details, and as
> > > soon as that's done, we'll post it here.
> > >
> > > Finally, as I said at that meeting, please only nominate yourselves at
> > > this time. If you really want to nominate someone else, tell them, and
> > > get them to nominate themselves if they want to run for it. Comments on
> > > wiki pages/to email lists will then probably follow.
> > >
> > > Pricey
> > Just a thought - isn#t the election procedure a bit broken?
> > I mean by having the line.
> > - The nominees support from at least one active IRC Council member
> > (essential)
> > Isn't this a bit broken? what if for some reason, the whole Council
> > Quits?
> We still have enough of a Council left (active... 3 of us) for this to
> not be an issue.
However, it's still broken. If it's "required" and all the IRCC quit...
there'd be no way to from a new council in line with the policies.
More information about the Ubuntu-irc