Irc Council - part 2 ( plus some more info to chew on )

[Dennis Kaarsemaker]

On ma, 2006-10-23 at 06:49 -0500, Brandon Holtsclaw wrote:

> Well I dont know how much we're "pretending" if you want +1's from us and not 
> the Council hehe but FWIW I personaly think elkbuntu will make a great 
> operator and dont know LjL so I'll let you all make an informed choice about 
> that.

+/-1 from the council, arguments pro/against from others are also
welcome but will not count as votes.

> One thing I would like to bring up about the IRC OP team that has seemed to 
> bit {us,me} in the rear once or twice.

[snipping the complete issue]

I agree very much with you on this, and once the 'council thing' has
settled, I do want to tackle it mostly along the lines of your
proposal. 
-- 
Dennis K.

Time is an illusion, lunchtime doubly so.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-irc/attachments/20061023/9e2ecc52/attachment.pgp>