On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Jkhatri <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:khatri.jatin@gmail.com">khatri.jatin@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
Dear all,<br>
<br>
Anyone can light on this, <br>
<br>
I'm installing Linux on my usb 16GB stick , but I'm wondering why only
vfat partition is needed to install the Linux on usb stick , why we
can't use extX type of FS to install the Linux???? is it necessary to
have vfat partition to install Linux instead of its native FS... ? is
there any solution for this ? <br>
<br>
I came to know that , SYSLINUX uses vfat .... thats why it is required
... but the same thing never happened in case of HDD ... I never
formated my hdd with vft to install Linux, it boots from extX type of
partition ... then why we need to format usb stick with vfat ????<br></div></blockquote><div><br>Grub does not need FAT, so using grub should solve this. Just tried Unetbootin Tinycore to a Ext2 formated USB. Failed to boot. Didn't investigate.<br>
</div></div><br>HDD doesn't use syslinux, it uses grub, grub2 or lilo in most cases.<br><br><br>Regards<br><br>Narendra Diwate<br><br><br>