[ubuntu-in] Ubuntu Install vs Live

[Raseel Bhagat]

On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Narendra Sisodiya <
narendra at narendrasisodiya.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Sriranga(78yrsold) <
> withblessings at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Have you tried with wube.exe (installing within the WinxP as part of its
>> software) It is very fast than live/installing
>> which I had experienced long back at the time of installing ubuntu 9.04.
>>
>>  On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Narendra Sisodiya <
>> narendra at narendrasisodiya.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:47 PM, Raseel Bhagat <raseelbhagat at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> No speed difference.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot. I was just asking this. and nothing else.
>>>
>>
> Actually, When I made SchoolOS remix, it comes out to be 2.1GB Live DVD.
> some students reported that they are unable to boot DVD. That is true
> because LiveDVD need good amount of RAM (don't know exact requirement). So I
> was asking more information on this.
> Next version is going to be 3-4GB and we are going to choose Install only
> option. No Live. so i was searching that How I can give both option.


Hi,

while it is generally true that a LiveDVD required more RAM than a LiveCD,
I have always thought that the reason for this is that a LiveDVD will offer
you many more options on boot, has a grub-screen with colors, et al.
Other than this, I don't see any reason why a LiveDVD should take up more
RAM. It just has more content.
CMIIW

--
Raseel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-in/attachments/20101008/c8d41349/attachment.htm