[ubuntu-in] If not Ubuntu then what
Jkhatri
khatri.jatin at gmail.com
Fri Mar 26 13:31:09 GMT 2010
On 03/23/2010 04:37 PM, Amarendra Kumar wrote:
> Great post Ram.
>
> I have been mulling over such issues recently. And similarly, I like
> Ubuntu but I used to love Ubuntu. Some changes have happened that I
> personally don't like and it's bound to happen in case of such a huge
> user base distro. But things like moving widgets to the left side is
> something I find weird as most of the users are windows migrants like
> me and left side widgets are painful too (I tried it on my friends Mac
> for long enough to be sure).
>
> I am triple booting Vista (for stuffs like Counter Strike etc.),
> Fedora (used seldom, didn't like actually) and Ubuntu is my main OS. I
> have planning on an Ubuntu alternative myself especially in case I
> have top ditch it seeing the growing control over it. I had chosen
> Arch Linux for that purpose which is included in Ram's list.
>
> So I will replace Fedora partition ===> Arch Linux.
>
> I don't know why but I have this strong feeling that I may convert to
> Mac once I can afford one :P
hacked mac is available for PC ( Intel Hardware )
OSx86 see .....................http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OSx86
have a look at this for more details ......http://ihackintosh.org/ideneb
;-)
> After all if I have to go for closed open source why not go for a
> better and solid closed closed source.
>
> These developments made one thing clear - I am not going to be a
> complete one-OS convert , not at least in near future. Options are
> always good.
>
> Somebody once rightly said in an IRC channel: " don't stick to one
> distro for long, you will lose the thrill". I am loosing it :)
>
> Cheers!!
>
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Ashutosh Rishi Ranjan
> <ashutoshrishi92 at gmail.com <mailto:ashutoshrishi92 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> > So not debating the specifics of Mark Shuttleworth's comments
> and the reactions
> > and the interpretations, I am getting an uneasy feeling. That
> maybe just maybe
> > we are becoming Ubuntu dependent and too complacent.
> >
> > I can walk blindfolded through a typical Ubuntu install and its
> subsequent
> > setup of additional programmes, tweaking programmes to work like
> they should
> > for me. Knowing what repos to add to get exactly what software
> and where to
> > source software (tuxwire, zyware).
> >
> > I cannot be happier with what i have. But what if we need to
> move to a freer
> > system. Are there any other distro's out there. Sure there are
> 600 plus many
> > of them with a passionate user base and with its attendant problem.
>
> Ubuntu has gone far from being a typical linux distro and its because
> of canonical. Ubuntu is now capable of challenging the macintosh and
> windows in their own game as a proper all-level consumer product.
> Getting its own music-store, thats an amazing feat (and its possible
> because of Canonical). Free and open source softwares are good. But in
> the main OS battlefield you cannot place your linux OS without a
> strong dedicated company (which will steer the advertising and
> management) backing it. Of course, the linux OS can be amazing in
> functioning, but thats it. It won't create much of an impact on
> 'everyone'.
>
> Canonical can rightfully guide ubuntu (and its amazing that they do it
> as saints). Because ubuntu is getting so popular, its essential for
> ubuntu to have Canonical securing its interests. The final decision to
> what appears in ubuntu is Canonical's decision and they really have to
> base their decision (now) on the fact that ubuntu is being eyed as a
> fierce competitor to mac and windows (even though there are other good
> linux OS, Ubuntu has entered the consumer stream more deeply). A good
> proof of this happening is that all the major softwares when available
> for download focus on ubuntu as a major consumer linux OS.
>
> I love Ubuntu because frankly till now I have had no objections to
> Canonical's decisions. I weigh their decisions in terms of its effect
> on new users not me because I know that the decision won't really
> affect me because I can choose what I want after installing the
> default. Canonical does not enforce but merely makes their decisions
> idiot-proof.
>
> > My questions are how would people feel about trying out a distro
> other than
> > Ubuntu (specially first time users), in fact have first time
> linux Ubuntu users
> > tried other distro's and what do they feel.
> >
> > I started of with fedora 1 and went through a variety and can
> make another
> > distro do to my bidding.
>
> I tried fedora. Found it not much different from my experience on
> ubuntu. Even though Ubuntu is moving to be more idiot-proof, it has
> definitely not left behind the powerhouse of linux like what fedora
> has. This is the best thing I like about ubuntu. You can team up
> old-school and new-school. Plus, I found ubuntu's development and
> package managers more better.
>
> Another distro I tried was Archos. Its brilliant! and fun. You can
> build your own OS based on your choice. I ruined my OS :P
>
>
> > My other question is how many of us dual boot a second linux OS
> and is your
> > secondary OS as well set as your primary, are you comfortable
> with it, under
> > all conditions.
>
> I had windows, ubuntu, fedora on the same computer. For some time I
> used fedora more than Ubuntu to see whether I should keep it.
> Eventually after a month I removed fedora from my main computer and
> gave its space to Ubuntu. Though I have had mad varieties on linux OS
> on my laptop. Currently I have Lucid beta1, Ubuntu karmic server and
> archos. I use archos mainly.
>
> > My 3rd question is what would you suggest people try as a fall
> back option in
> > case people want to try and alternative.
> >
> > My suggestions are Pardus, Mandriva, OpenSuse, Fedora, Knoppix
> > Others have suggested Arch Linux
>
> I would suggest Fedora and so would Linus Torvald :)
>
> > The few times in the recent past when i tried another distro i
> very quickly
> > reverted back to Ubuntu, since i was uncomfortable around my
> system but now i
> > think its worth exploring an alternative in great earnest.
> >
> > look forward to reactions
> >
> > ram
> >
>
> For me, I go with the fact that at the end of the day, "Ubuntu is just
> linux OS with different packages than other OS, apt-get can get you
> anywhere."
>
>
>
> --
> Ashutosh Rishi
> Stay Hungry, Stay Foolish
>
> --
> ubuntu-in mailing list
> ubuntu-in at lists.ubuntu.com <mailto:ubuntu-in at lists.ubuntu.com>
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-in
>
>
>
>
> --
> Amarendra Kumar
> Final Year Undergraduate
> Dept. of IT, NIT Patna
> http://amarendra.web.officelive.com
>
> "Stay hungry, stay foolish"
--
Jatin Khatri
Web www.khatrijatin.co.nr <http://www.khatrijatin.co.nr/>
www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Jatin <http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Jatin>
Phone (+91) 98250 20393
* Save Paper, Save Environment. *
/*(Plant at least one tree in your life and nurture it !!!)*/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-in/attachments/20100326/616a4b33/attachment.htm
More information about the ubuntu-in
mailing list