[ubuntu-in] Ubuntu 32 bit or 64 bit?

Shrikant Khanduri shrikant.khanduri at gmail.com
Wed Apr 7 15:00:05 BST 2010


Your RAM Comsumption will be more wrt 32 bit OS.
Although Future is 64 Bit OS. Go for it.



On 7 April 2010 19:09, Abhinav Modi <abhinavmodi at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 8:24 AM, Mohamed Khaleel <gotokhaleel at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>  > Hello Everyone,
> >
> > I have a Core 2 Duo PC and I have to install Ubuntu on it. I would like
> to
> > know if I have to go with 32 bit or 64 bit. Sure I know that 32 OS bit
> will
> > work on 64 bit processor. But I want to really use the 64 bit if its
> > supported by processor.
> >
> > Are there any known issues in the 64 bit version of Ubuntu with Core 2
> Duo
> > (if supported)?
> > How is the availability of softwares(open source, some graphics card
> drivers
> > etc)?
> > Will all 32 bit packages work on 64 bit Ubuntu OS?
> >
>
> Have been using Ubuntu 64 bit with an AMD Quad Core (9.10, upgraded to
> 10.04 beta recently). Haven't had any issues with 9.10 at all. With
> 10.04 there is some problem with flash, which will hopefully be
> resolved before final release.
>
> I would say go for 64 bit.
>
> Hope this helps
> Abhinav
>
> http://indimark.blogspot.com
> http://www.employees.org/~abhinav/blog
>
> --
>  ubuntu-in mailing list
> ubuntu-in at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-in
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-in/attachments/20100407/70c51c9a/attachment.htm 


More information about the ubuntu-in mailing list