[ubuntu-in] ntfs file system

[unni krishnan]

No you are not right. The all happend because some problems in ubuntu-in
list. When ever i send a mail to this list i will get a bounce from the list
saying that " your mail has to be confirmed by list moderator . If he
accepts i will be send to mailing list or you will get the bounce notice " .
I had send the problem about 2 weeks earlier after waiting for list aprooval
i went for www.ubuntuforum.org where i got a better explaination for the
solution of my problem. After that i got the moderator aprooval and then got
the response from the list.

i suggest ntfs-config because installing ntfs-config will automatically
install ntfs-3g also. Ntfs-config gives a good graphical user interface
configuring ntfs-3g. If you are keen to know how to configure ntfs-3g
manually i think its better to go for ntfs-3g only

here is a link that i got from ubuntu forum
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=217009

On 3/4/07, Ramnarayan. K <ramnarayan.k at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: unni krishnan < unnikrishnan.a at gmail.com>
> To: ubuntu-in at lists.ubuntu.com
> Sent: Friday, 23 February, 2007 12:57:46 AM
> Subject: [ubuntu-in] ntfs file system
>
> > I am using ubuntu 6.06 lts with windows xp. I had 2 ntfs and 1 fat32
> partition in XP . Ubuntu > mounts all the partition in xp but in NTFS
> partition i am not able to write any files it's says    > read only file
> system .Is there any way to make it writable in ubuntu
>
> On 3/1/07, venkatesh.nandakumar at yahoo.co.uk <
> venkatesh.nandakumar at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > sudo apt-get install ntfs-3g
> > and then change /etc/fstab (change all the 'ntfs' keywords corresponding
> to the partition to > > ntfs-3g)
>
> On 3/1/07, unni krishnan <unnikrishnan.a at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for your replay. But i think it better to go for ntfs-config
> > sudo apt-get install ntfs-config
> >
> >
> Am not sure I undertsand the flow of the conversation - did you come
> across the ntfs-config solution after your first post or did you know it
> before, if the latter is it supposed to be a test of the ubuntu skills of
> the people advicing ???
>
> if you says its better to go in for ntfs-config - why - what makes it
> better than ntfs-3g
>
> ram
>
> --
> ubuntu-in mailing list
> ubuntu-in at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-in
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-in/attachments/20070305/764649b9/attachment.htm