Removing unneeded package dependencies on Unity
Jeremy Bicha
jbicha at ubuntu.com
Sat Mar 4 17:07:04 UTC 2017
On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 11:24 AM, Pander <pander at users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Even if you start out with the iso, in daily usage, you have access to
> all packages via apt-get. It is not so much the starting collection from
> the iso, more as what can get pulled in.
You framed the issue as an Ubuntu GNOME issue. So I suggest trying to
come up with a simpler test case than "I installed Ubuntu GNOME plus
other stuff and some of the other stuff depends on other stuff I don't
think I want.)
> Some systems have very scarce resources. That the library is not that
> big, is not a reason to get it installed automatically.
Sorry, Ubuntu GNOME does not support this theoretical computer that
can't install a 1MB library.
> Some examples are:
Those examples are from apps where there is clear upstream separation
between support for different GUIs. I don't think it makes sense to
have separate packages for "Pidgin with Unity" and "Pidgin without
Unity". How would we make sure that people get the right version for
them?
> APT::Install-Recommends "false";
Turning recommends off globally is not supported.
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-binarydeps
If you can come up with a patch that does not cause regressions for
Unity users while helping users of other desktops, I and others would
be glad to review it. Otherwise, I don't see an issue here with some
apps depending on libunity.
Thanks,
Jeremy
More information about the Ubuntu-GNOME
mailing list