Difference between installation methods (16.04)

[Tim]

On 03/05/16 17:21, Narcis Garcia wrote:
> I haven't tested text mode install with 16.04 version of Ubuntus, but I
> imagine it's still the Debian Installer with same tools deployed and
> proved for Debian.
The graphical installer uses many of the same tools, and inherited a number of bugs from those tools this cycle (mostly fixed though I think), I
guess the text mode has a better time since its much closer to the debian version.
>
> I've solved a lot of times specific installations and disk
> configurations with DebianInstaller (alternate/netinst disks)
>
>
> El 03/05/16 a les 06:14, Tim ha escrit:
>>
>> On 03/05/16 14:06, Júlio Maranhão wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> What is the difference between these two install methods:
>>>
>>> 1) Use Ubuntu GNOME DVD (aka GNOME flavor);
>>> 2) Use Ubuntu network installer and select Ubuntu GNOME Desktop.
>> The end result should be the same, the main difference is the installer
>>> P.S.: To install default Ubuntu I need netinst ISO because the graphical partitioner (manual mode) is broken: it can't deal with a simple LVM
>>> above crypt. I don't know why. The text mode partitioner just do the job!
>> IF that was with Ubuntu 16.04, likely the same issue affects our graphical installer, its the same installer (with a different slideshow)
>>> Cheers.
>>>
>>> Júlio
>>>
>>>
>>