GNOME Ubuntu Logo

Mon May 27 05:57:32 UTC 2013

Alfre I love ur design. It is awsome. However, what I think about the color is that it shouldn't be black because won't be appealing to nowadays colored screen, ladies nd men wt high flambouyant test like me. In this regards, I do think is either the whole logo should be colored green or mix both green and brown to make it appear as Karki. Ultimately the choice of color can be with respect to both GNOME and Ubuntu color mixed together or interchanged(swap).
Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone provided by Airtel Nigeria.

-----Original Message-----
From: ubuntu-gnome-request at lists.ubuntu.com
Sender: ubuntu-gnome-bounces at lists.ubuntu.comDate: Sun, 26 May 2013 22:11:12 
To: <ubuntu-gnome at lists.ubuntu.com>
Reply-To: ubuntu-gnome at lists.ubuntu.com
Subject: Ubuntu-GNOME Digest, Vol 3, Issue 21

Send Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list submissions to
	ubuntu-gnome at lists.ubuntu.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	ubuntu-gnome-request at lists.ubuntu.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
	ubuntu-gnome-owner at lists.ubuntu.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Ubuntu-GNOME digest..."

Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Ubuntu GNOME logo design (Everaldo Canuto)
   2. Re: Ubuntu GNOME logo design (Alfredo Hern?ndez)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 17:38:49 -0300
From: Everaldo Canuto <everaldo.canuto at gmail.com>
Cc: Ubuntu GNOME <ubuntu-gnome at lists.ubuntu.com>
Subject: Re: Ubuntu GNOME logo design
Message-ID:
	<CACYgWUnnCwizzKOkNvoVip8f_W1EQs_i6+pAJRTa1PY9v=P1zA at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

One of the reasons I asked to change the name from Ubuntu GNOME to any
other name (eg. Gubuntu) is just because this long logos with two names is
just hard to pronounce and also hard to do something since we need to fit
both GNOME guidelines and Ubuntu guidelines.

With the name "Ubuntu GNOME" theres no way to make a different logo. Also,
just remember that (they always say it is not true) GNOME today is mostly a
RedHat project and they are not going make things easy to us.

Sadly :(

2013/5/26 Alfredo Hern?ndez <aldomann.designs at gmail.com>

> Hi,
>
> First, I doubt that the GNOME board will accept such a variation of the
> GNOME foot; they are very strict about modifications of their branding.
>
> Second, all official Ubuntu spins follow the same design philosophy, I
> don't see any serious reason about doing the contrary.
>
> About the resemblance to the GNOME logo, the GNOME board don't have enough
> problem about it, as I was informed by Andreas a few days ago. Using the
> GNOME foot creates a direct link with GNOME, which is the exact purpose of
> our distribution.
>
> Regards, Alfredo.
> On 26 May 2013 22:02, <itsuga at agusti.cat> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Alfredo has done a good work, but I think the logo is very similar to
>> Gnome's.
>>
>> So my proposal for the Ubuntu GNOME logo is to rotate the Gnome foot 90
>> degrees so an "U" can be read,
>> and with this version no colour is needed to differentiate from Gnome's
>> logo, so it can be black:
>> a png of the proposal => http://agusti.cat/ubuntu-**
>> gnome-logo/ubuntu-gnome-logo-**agusti.png<http://agusti.cat/ubuntu-gnome-logo/ubuntu-gnome-logo-agusti.png>
>> and the svg version => http://agusti.cat/ubuntu-**
>> gnome-logo/ubuntu-gnome-logo-**agusti.svg<http://agusti.cat/ubuntu-gnome-logo/ubuntu-gnome-logo-agusti.svg>
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Agust?.
>>
>> A 2013-05-25 16:27, Bastien Traverse escrigu?:
>>
>>  Hi all,
>>>
>>> Kudos to Alfredo for his work. I really like the more spaced logo.
>>>
>>> However I have the same feeling as Erick Brunzell about the colour : at
>>> first the blue made me think of Kubuntu... Until I realized Xubuntu and
>>> Lubuntu both used a blue circle too! How weird. But okay, blue is
>>> definitely GNOMish since Adwaita. So... Everything's fine here, great
>>> work!
>>>
>>> Regards, Bastien
>>>
>>> 2013/5/25 Alfredo Hern?ndez <aldomann.designs at gmail.com>
>>>
>>>  You're welcome. Actually, in the designs, it works a lot better. The
>>>> original one felt like some kind of one worded e-mail address or
>>>> something.
>>>>
>>>> About colour, I think we all agree Adwaita blue is very GNOMEish and is
>>>> very accordant with the distro appearance. We could use other tones of
>>>> blue, but the one used is particularly brightish and works well in
>>>> several situations.
>>>>
>>>> Regards, Alfredo.
>>>>
>>>> Hi Alfredo,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for incorporating my feedback. For what it's worth, I love your
>>>> designs.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Dave
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Alfredo Hern?ndez
>>>> <aldomann.designs at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello there,
>>>>>
>>>>> I've finished the logo iterations, proposals for the social pages
>>>>>
>>>> branding
>>>>
>>>>> and a very simple website mockup to see the logo in action.
>>>>>
>>>>> Logos: http://cl.ly/image/**3v3Z3C3B212W<http://cl.ly/image/3v3Z3C3B212W>[1]
>>>>> Social pages branding: http://cl.ly/image/**3T1a3X47420f<http://cl.ly/image/3T1a3X47420f>[2]
>>>>> Webpage mockup: http://cl.ly/image/**0b2n2u0O183r<http://cl.ly/image/0b2n2u0O183r>[3]
>>>>>
>>>>> Tell me what you think, mates.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards, Alfredo.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 24 May 2013 01:57, Alfredo Hern?ndez
>>>>>
>>>> <aldomann.designs at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> I'll have that in mind when making iterations, Dave. Thanks for
>>>>>>
>>>>> pointing
>>>>
>>>>> that up.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yeah, I'm also a bit disappointed about not using Cantarell (which
>>>>>>
>>>>> looks
>>>>
>>>>> fantastic), but GNOME's font doesn't look bad at all.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards, Alfredo.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 24 May 2013 01:25, "Dave Steinberg" <dmsteinberg at gmail.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's great that you heard back, but too bad they don't want to let
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> you
>>>>
>>>>> use Cantarell.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm newish to the list, and wasn't around for the previous logo
>>>>>>> discussions, but I went back and looked at the archives. I really
>>>>>>> liked the way Cantarell looked with the Ubuntu logo. Oh well.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> One thing I was wondering about: why the lack of space between the
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> two
>>>>
>>>>> words? It seems pretty clear that the name is two separate words
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> with
>>>>
>>>>> a space between (from the Web site, the social media pages, this
>>>>>>> mailing list...), so I wonder if having no space in the logo might
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> add
>>>>
>>>>> some confusion.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for all your work!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> Dave
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Alfredo Hern?ndez
>>>>>>> <aldomann.designs at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Great new guys, Tobias Mueller and Andreas Nilsson from GNOME
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> have
>>>>
>>>>>  responded
>>>>>>>> me about GNOME trademark use:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi!
>>>>>>>> After talking to the board about this, we feel it would be
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> better to
>>>>
>>>>>  use the
>>>>>>>> GNOME logo typeface instead of Cantarell.[...]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This weekend (I'm very busy right now) I'll make the changes to
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> the
>>>>
>>>>>  previous
>>>>>>>> logo and I'll post the new one here in order to discuss its
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> final form
>>>>
>>>>>  (if
>>>>>>>> we decide to use my proposal).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Also, I've been making some mockups of how the website (a design
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> based
>>>>
>>>>>  on
>>>>>>>> the current Ubuntu website) could look like using the proposed
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> logo to
>>>>
>>>>>  show
>>>>>>>> how it would look in a real situation. Also, I'll make mockups
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> of the
>>>>
>>>>>  social
>>>>>>>> pages branding (Google+ page and Facebook).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>> Alfredo.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list
>>>>>>>> Ubuntu-GNOME at lists.ubuntu.com
>>>>>>>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>>>>>>>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/**mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome<https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome>[4]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list
>>>>>>> Ubuntu-GNOME at lists.ubuntu.com
>>>>>>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>>>>>>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/**mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome<https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome>[4]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list
>>>> Ubuntu-GNOME at lists.ubuntu.com
>>>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>>>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/**mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome<https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome>[4]
>>>> --
>>>> Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list
>>>> Ubuntu-GNOME at lists.ubuntu.com
>>>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>>>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/**mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome<https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome>[4]
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> Links:
>> ------
>> [1] http://cl.ly/image/**3v3Z3C3B212W <http://cl.ly/image/3v3Z3C3B212W>
>> [2] http://cl.ly/image/**3T1a3X47420f <http://cl.ly/image/3T1a3X47420f>
>> [3] http://cl.ly/image/**0b2n2u0O183r <http://cl.ly/image/0b2n2u0O183r>
>> [4] https://lists.ubuntu.com/**mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome<https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome>
>>
>> --
>> Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list
>> Ubuntu-GNOME at lists.ubuntu.com
>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/**
>> mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome<https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome>
>>
>
> --
> Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list
> Ubuntu-GNOME at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome
>
>

-- 
Everaldo Canuto
+55 11 981-141-805 | everaldo.canuto at gmail.com
+55 11 941 116 233

01100101 01110110 01100101 01110010
01100001 01101100 01100100 01101111
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-gnome/attachments/20130526/dbf5b880/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 00:10:27 +0200
From: Alfredo Hern?ndez <aldomann.designs at gmail.com>
To: Everaldo Canuto <everaldo.canuto at gmail.com>
Cc: Ubuntu GNOME <ubuntu-gnome at lists.ubuntu.com>
Subject: Re: Ubuntu GNOME logo design
Message-ID:
	<CAApUPqkhTCqsSq=hRZahxQm2o7v9Jk81=Lst5-aHZ7SkF+DV-A at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

The only thing they (GNOME) wanted was us to use the official GNOME font,
so as far as I am concerned, they are fine with us using the GNOME foot
over the blue circle. I'll send a message to the GNOME board with the new
logo proposal and the way we want to use the branding in social pages.
Hopefully, we should expect no problems.

Regards.

On 26 May 2013 22:38, Everaldo Canuto <everaldo.canuto at gmail.com> wrote:

> One of the reasons I asked to change the name from Ubuntu GNOME to any
> other name (eg. Gubuntu) is just because this long logos with two names is
> just hard to pronounce and also hard to do something since we need to fit
> both GNOME guidelines and Ubuntu guidelines.
>
> With the name "Ubuntu GNOME" theres no way to make a different logo. Also,
> just remember that (they always say it is not true) GNOME today is mostly a
> RedHat project and they are not going make things easy to us.
>
> Sadly :(
>
>
>
> 2013/5/26 Alfredo Hern?ndez <aldomann.designs at gmail.com>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> First, I doubt that the GNOME board will accept such a variation of the
>> GNOME foot; they are very strict about modifications of their branding.
>>
>> Second, all official Ubuntu spins follow the same design philosophy, I
>> don't see any serious reason about doing the contrary.
>>
>> About the resemblance to the GNOME logo, the GNOME board don't have
>> enough problem about it, as I was informed by Andreas a few days ago. Using
>> the GNOME foot creates a direct link with GNOME, which is the exact purpose
>> of our distribution.
>>
>> Regards, Alfredo.
>> On 26 May 2013 22:02, <itsuga at agusti.cat> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Alfredo has done a good work, but I think the logo is very similar to
>>> Gnome's.
>>>
>>> So my proposal for the Ubuntu GNOME logo is to rotate the Gnome foot 90
>>> degrees so an "U" can be read,
>>> and with this version no colour is needed to differentiate from Gnome's
>>> logo, so it can be black:
>>> a png of the proposal => http://agusti.cat/ubuntu-**
>>> gnome-logo/ubuntu-gnome-logo-**agusti.png<http://agusti.cat/ubuntu-gnome-logo/ubuntu-gnome-logo-agusti.png>
>>> and the svg version => http://agusti.cat/ubuntu-**
>>> gnome-logo/ubuntu-gnome-logo-**agusti.svg<http://agusti.cat/ubuntu-gnome-logo/ubuntu-gnome-logo-agusti.svg>
>>>
>>> What do you think?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Agust?.
>>>
>>> A 2013-05-25 16:27, Bastien Traverse escrigu?:
>>>
>>>  Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Kudos to Alfredo for his work. I really like the more spaced logo.
>>>>
>>>> However I have the same feeling as Erick Brunzell about the colour : at
>>>> first the blue made me think of Kubuntu... Until I realized Xubuntu and
>>>> Lubuntu both used a blue circle too! How weird. But okay, blue is
>>>> definitely GNOMish since Adwaita. So... Everything's fine here, great
>>>> work!
>>>>
>>>> Regards, Bastien
>>>>
>>>> 2013/5/25 Alfredo Hern?ndez <aldomann.designs at gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>>  You're welcome. Actually, in the designs, it works a lot better. The
>>>>> original one felt like some kind of one worded e-mail address or
>>>>> something.
>>>>>
>>>>> About colour, I think we all agree Adwaita blue is very GNOMEish and is
>>>>> very accordant with the distro appearance. We could use other tones of
>>>>> blue, but the one used is particularly brightish and works well in
>>>>> several situations.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards, Alfredo.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Alfredo,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for incorporating my feedback. For what it's worth, I love your
>>>>> designs.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Dave
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Alfredo Hern?ndez
>>>>> <aldomann.designs at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello there,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've finished the logo iterations, proposals for the social pages
>>>>>>
>>>>> branding
>>>>>
>>>>>> and a very simple website mockup to see the logo in action.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Logos: http://cl.ly/image/**3v3Z3C3B212W<http://cl.ly/image/3v3Z3C3B212W>[1]
>>>>>> Social pages branding: http://cl.ly/image/**3T1a3X47420f<http://cl.ly/image/3T1a3X47420f>[2]
>>>>>> Webpage mockup: http://cl.ly/image/**0b2n2u0O183r<http://cl.ly/image/0b2n2u0O183r>[3]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tell me what you think, mates.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards, Alfredo.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 24 May 2013 01:57, Alfredo Hern?ndez
>>>>>>
>>>>> <aldomann.designs at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'll have that in mind when making iterations, Dave. Thanks for
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> pointing
>>>>>
>>>>>> that up.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yeah, I'm also a bit disappointed about not using Cantarell (which
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> looks
>>>>>
>>>>>> fantastic), but GNOME's font doesn't look bad at all.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards, Alfredo.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 24 May 2013 01:25, "Dave Steinberg" <dmsteinberg at gmail.com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's great that you heard back, but too bad they don't want to let
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> you
>>>>>
>>>>>> use Cantarell.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm newish to the list, and wasn't around for the previous logo
>>>>>>>> discussions, but I went back and looked at the archives. I really
>>>>>>>> liked the way Cantarell looked with the Ubuntu logo. Oh well.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> One thing I was wondering about: why the lack of space between the
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> two
>>>>>
>>>>>> words? It seems pretty clear that the name is two separate words
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> with
>>>>>
>>>>>> a space between (from the Web site, the social media pages, this
>>>>>>>> mailing list...), so I wonder if having no space in the logo might
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> add
>>>>>
>>>>>> some confusion.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks for all your work!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>> Dave
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Alfredo Hern?ndez
>>>>>>>> <aldomann.designs at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Great new guys, Tobias Mueller and Andreas Nilsson from GNOME
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>
>>>>>>  responded
>>>>>>>>> me about GNOME trademark use:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi!
>>>>>>>>> After talking to the board about this, we feel it would be
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> better to
>>>>>
>>>>>>  use the
>>>>>>>>> GNOME logo typeface instead of Cantarell.[...]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This weekend (I'm very busy right now) I'll make the changes to
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>
>>>>>>  previous
>>>>>>>>> logo and I'll post the new one here in order to discuss its
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> final form
>>>>>
>>>>>>  (if
>>>>>>>>> we decide to use my proposal).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Also, I've been making some mockups of how the website (a design
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> based
>>>>>
>>>>>>  on
>>>>>>>>> the current Ubuntu website) could look like using the proposed
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> logo to
>>>>>
>>>>>>  show
>>>>>>>>> how it would look in a real situation. Also, I'll make mockups
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> of the
>>>>>
>>>>>>  social
>>>>>>>>> pages branding (Google+ page and Facebook).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>> Alfredo.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list
>>>>>>>>> Ubuntu-GNOME at lists.ubuntu.com
>>>>>>>>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>>>>>>>>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/**mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome<https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome>[4]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list
>>>>>>>> Ubuntu-GNOME at lists.ubuntu.com
>>>>>>>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>>>>>>>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/**mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome<https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome>[4]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list
>>>>> Ubuntu-GNOME at lists.ubuntu.com
>>>>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>>>>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/**mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome<https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome>[4]
>>>>> --
>>>>> Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list
>>>>> Ubuntu-GNOME at lists.ubuntu.com
>>>>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>>>>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/**mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome<https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome>[4]
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Links:
>>> ------
>>> [1] http://cl.ly/image/**3v3Z3C3B212W <http://cl.ly/image/3v3Z3C3B212W>
>>> [2] http://cl.ly/image/**3T1a3X47420f <http://cl.ly/image/3T1a3X47420f>
>>> [3] http://cl.ly/image/**0b2n2u0O183r <http://cl.ly/image/0b2n2u0O183r>
>>> [4] https://lists.ubuntu.com/**mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome<https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list
>>> Ubuntu-GNOME at lists.ubuntu.com
>>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/**
>>> mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome<https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list
>> Ubuntu-GNOME at lists.ubuntu.com
>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Everaldo Canuto
> +55 11 981-141-805 | everaldo.canuto at gmail.com
> +55 11 941 116 233
>
> 01100101 01110110 01100101 01110010
> 01100001 01101100 01100100 01101111
>
> --
> Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list
> Ubuntu-GNOME at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-gnome/attachments/20130527/4dbcd8d3/attachment.html>

------------------------------

-- 
Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list
Ubuntu-GNOME at lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome

End of Ubuntu-GNOME Digest, Vol 3, Issue 21
*******************************************