Ubuntu 10.10 on Lenovo G560

Amr Ali amr.ali.cc at gmail.com
Thu Apr 14 06:50:42 UTC 2011


Hi Angie,

I'm glad that you finally found a solution (a workaround?) for your problem. As
you may know, Linux in general is all the same. I feel that I'm about to preach
to the choir here, but w/e.

Really, all that can possibly differ from one distro to the other is ...

1) Package system. (yes, no, type?)
2) Filesystem structure.

All I'm trying to say is, what really differs from a distro to another is you
getting used to different types of applications that practically achieves the
same thing.

Now I'll advise against anything REDHAT for the ideology of REDHAT but
necessarily for the quality (though, APT > YUM any day!), frankly a large
portion of kernel enhancements and security patches comes from REDHAT, but
that's aside from the point.

I'm what you would call a low level nut, I have an intimate crush on Slackware
and the like, however, I just can't use something like that on daily basis, its
counter productive at best. Also I can't stand any desktop environment that has
leaks or too many flashy mumbo-jumbo, so I reseted for XFCE on Ubuntu.

The point is, use/learn something that makes your day lot less harder on you,
CentOS is never meant to be a desktop distro, same goes for Debian (I was a
Debian fanatic back in the day). That reflects greatly on the kind of software
versions you will find in the distro's repo. So far Ubuntu is doing a great job
keeping up with the speed of things, I'm not sure about Fedora, but used it on a
couple of jobs before and it never got in my way too.

All in all, good luck, and I hope you have a better experience with Fedora. :-)

~// AA

On 04/14/2011 07:13 AM, Angie T. Muhammad wrote:
> Dear List,
>  Thank you so much for your instant responses and apologies for late mine.
> 
> In the past few days I have tried an Ubuntu 10.10 live CD and the screen came to
> a colorful 1366 x 768, so I made sure it is not a faulty hardware. I followed
> Amr's solution of decompiling DSDT, but I didn't know how to fix the warnings.
> From that point I moved on to trying different kernels on CentOS. I used
> ready-made packages, different versions (2.6.32, 2.6.35, 2.6.38) but to no
> avail. I built my own kernel from kernel.org <http://kernel.org> sources also
> using different versions and applyied patches but reaching no result. Eventually
> I built using source RPM packages but still failing. I updated my CentOS
> installation from 5.3 to 5.6 but that was useless either. I posted on CentOS
> forums but no one could help. So, I gave CentOS a last chance and downloaded a
> Live CD, still same old resolution of 1024 x 768. So I made a major decision and
> downloaded Fedora 14 Live CD, expectedly its drivers ran a beautiful 1366 x 768
> resolution like Ubuntu. So, I waved a good bye to CentOS on this machine and
> here I am writing you from my new Fedora installation.
> 
> PS. My work and experience are mostly RHEL based, that's why I can not afford
> moving to a Debian based distro like Ubuntu, but who can't confess, nafa3 wa2t
> zan2a :D ..
> 
> Thanks again guys for your time.
> 
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 2:46 AM, Amr Ali <amr.ali.cc
> <http://amr.ali.cc>@gmail.com <http://gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>     Hi Angie,
> 
>     I strongly belief that this is an ACPI (Advanced Configuration and Power
>     Interface) issue, some laptops have faulty DSDT (Differentiated System
>     Description Table), I've fixed a few warnings in mine, didn't really affect
>     anything "tangible" on my Lenovo N500 (Check out
>     http://amrali.se/247/lenovo-value-line-n500-42336qg-acpi-dsdt-fix/), but some
>     faulty DSDTs do cause major problems. What really alerted me for your problem is
>     not that you can't get X at certain resolutions but the brightness issue, which
>     really says it has to do with something at this level of abstraction (i.e.
>     ACPI).
>     </rant>
> 
>     I have details on how to fix it on the website link I gave you, but, if you are
>     not familiar ASL/AML, I can always help with that, you just have to extract the
>     DSDT table from your kernel's memory (the details are on the site too).
> 
>     PS: Good choice, I'm sorry for your problems, but I never had "real" problems
>     with my N500, but anyways, we hope that we'll get your problem fixed. :-)
> 
>     ~// AA
> 
>     On 04/10/2011 01:51 AM, Angie T. Muhammad wrote:
>     > Hello Guys,
>     >
>     >  I hope you are all doing well.
>     >
>     > I have recently bought a Lenovo G560
>     > <http://egyptlaptop.com/lenovo-g560-clone-2.html> and installed CentOS 5.3
>     (Free
>     > RHEL) and every thing is working now pretty fine except screen resolution. I
>     > have tried three drivers so far with different color depth in xorg.conf but I
>     > never used a `modeline`
>     >
>     > a- i810 :: X fails to start in 16 or 24 color depth
>     > b- i915 :: a.k.a intel :: X starts with either 16 or 24 color depth at 1152 x
>     > 768 as maximum resolution, but the screen is really really really dark that I
>     > have to be 10 to 15 cm from screen to figure out what is displayed. Of course
>     > under this scenario, I have tried to increase brightness but at no avail. I
>     > would really appreciate help if any one has any idea about this.
>     > c- vesa :: This is the default :unfortunately. X starts with either 16 or 24
>     > color depth, colors are bright but only at 1024 x 768 as maximum
>     resolution. Of
>     > course this resolution is unbearable on a 15.6 inch wide screen.
>     >
>     > So I was wondering if any of you had used Ubuntu 10.10 on similar hardware, I
>     > would be very grateful if you can report on success / failure, kernel,
>     xorg and
>     > driver info, screen resolution and brightness.
>     >
>     > * Here are a few HW / SW info and logs:
>     >
>     > *# lspci*
>     > 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation Core Processor DRAM Controller (rev 02)
>     > 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Core Processor Integrated
>     > Graphics Controller (rev 02)
>     > 00:16.0 Communication controller: Intel Corporation 5 Series/3400 Series
>     Chipset
>     > HECI Controller (rev 06)
>     > 00:1a.0 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 5 Series/3400 Series Chipset USB2
>     > Enhanced Host Controller (rev 05)
>     > 00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 5 Series/3400 Series Chipset High
>     > Definition Audio (rev 05)
>     > 00:1c.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 5 Series/3400 Series Chipset PCI Express
>     > Root Port 1 (rev 05)
>     > 00:1c.1 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 5 Series/3400 Series Chipset PCI Express
>     > Root Port 2 (rev 05)
>     > 00:1c.2 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 5 Series/3400 Series Chipset PCI Express
>     > Root Port 3 (rev 05)
>     > 00:1c.4 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 5 Series/3400 Series Chipset PCI Express
>     > Root Port 5 (rev 05)
>     > 00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 5 Series/3400 Series Chipset USB2
>     > Enhanced Host Controller (rev 05)
>     > 00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801 Mobile PCI Bridge (rev a5)
>     > 00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation Mobile 5 Series Chipset LPC Interface
>     > Controller (rev 05)
>     > 00:1f.2 SATA controller: Intel Corporation 5 Series/3400 Series Chipset 4 port
>     > SATA AHCI Controller (rev 05)
>     > 00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corporation 5 Series/3400 Series Chipset SMBus Controller
>     > (rev 05)
>     > 00:1f.6 Signal processing controller: Intel Corporation 5 Series/3400 Series
>     > Chipset Thermal Subsystem (rev 05)
>     > 05:00.0 Network controller: Atheros Communications Inc. AR9285 Wireless
>     Network
>     > Adapter (PCI-Express) (rev 01)
>     > 06:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8101E/RTL8102E
>     > PCI Express Fast Ethernet controller (rev 02)
>     > ff:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation Core Processor QuickPath Architecture
>     > Generic Non-core Registers (rev 02)
>     > ff:00.1 Host bridge: Intel Corporation Core Processor QuickPath Architecture
>     > System Address Decoder (rev 02)
>     > ff:02.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation Core Processor QPI Link 0 (rev 02)
>     > ff:02.1 Host bridge: Intel Corporation Core Processor QPI Physical 0 (rev 02)
>     > ff:02.2 Host bridge: Intel Corporation Core Processor Reserved (rev 02)
>     > ff:02.3 Host bridge: Intel Corporation Core Processor Reserved (rev 02)
>     >
>     > *# lspci -n*
>     > 00:00.0 0600: 8086:0044 (rev 02)
>     > 00:02.0 0300: 8086:0046 (rev 02)
>     > 00:16.0 0780: 8086:3b64 (rev 06)
>     > 00:1a.0 0c03: 8086:3b3c (rev 05)
>     > 00:1b.0 0403: 8086:3b56 (rev 05)
>     > 00:1c.0 0604: 8086:3b42 (rev 05)
>     > 00:1c.1 0604: 8086:3b44 (rev 05)
>     > 00:1c.2 0604: 8086:3b46 (rev 05)
>     > 00:1c.4 0604: 8086:3b4a (rev 05)
>     > 00:1d.0 0c03: 8086:3b34 (rev 05)
>     > 00:1e.0 0604: 8086:2448 (rev a5)
>     > 00:1f.0 0601: 8086:3b09 (rev 05)
>     > 00:1f.2 0106: 8086:3b29 (rev 05)
>     > 00:1f.3 0c05: 8086:3b30 (rev 05)
>     > 00:1f.6 1180: 8086:3b32 (rev 05)
>     > 05:00.0 0280: 168c:002b (rev 01)
>     > 06:00.0 0200: 10ec:8136 (rev 02)
>     > ff:00.0 0600: 8086:2c62 (rev 02)
>     > ff:00.1 0600: 8086:2d01 (rev 02)
>     > ff:02.0 0600: 8086:2d10 (rev 02)
>     > ff:02.1 0600: 8086:2d11 (rev 02)
>     > ff:02.2 0600: 8086:2d12 (rev 02)
>     > ff:02.3 0600: 8086:2d13 (rev 02)
>     >
>     > *# uname -r*
>     > 2.6.18-194.32.1.el5
>     >
>     > *# grep -i "Monitor name" /var/log/Xorg.**
>     > /var/log/Xorg.0.log:(II) VESA(0): Monitor name: LP156WH2-TLAA
>     > /var/log/Xorg.0.log.old:(II) intel(0): Monitor name: LP156WH2-TLAA
>     >
>     > N.B. Monitor is autoconfigured. I couldn't find Lenovo monitors and
>     experienced
>     > failure as well with other models as user-specified.
>     >
>     > If you need any further info, please let me know. Your help is really
>     appreciated.
>     > Thanks
>     >
>     > --
>     > All the best,
>     > Angie T. Muhammad
>     > http://angie-tawfik.blogspot.com
>     >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> All the best,
> Angie T. Muhammad
> http://angie-tawfik.blogspot.com
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-eg/attachments/20110414/94f3d8ab/attachment.pgp>


More information about the Ubuntu-eg mailing list