<div dir="ltr">I couldnt agree more Tom but there is a problem where they still would need to be checked every release in case the version of particular server side software for instance gets bumped to a newer version </div> <div class="gmail_extra"> <div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Tom Davies <<a href="mailto:tomcecf@gmail.com" target="_blank">tomcecf@gmail.com</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> Hi :) Wiki pages tend to be better if they are not written for a specific release. The more generic a page is the longer it usually lasts and maybe even be useful for wider *buntus, maybe even Mint and other off-shoots, maybe Debian and maybe even further afield. If pages have tags for specific releases then ALL pages are going to need to be checked and updated for every release, even if the only update is to add the new tag. Regards from Tom :) On 7 December 2013 09:24, Jonathan Aquilina <<a href="mailto:eagles051387@gmail.com">eagles051387@gmail.com</a>> wrote: > You forgot to mention if not automate it at least make it somehow required > that a tag is needed. > > > On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 8:29 AM, Hannie Dumoleyn > <<a href="mailto:lafeber-dumoleyn2@zonnet.nl">lafeber-dumoleyn2@zonnet.nl</a>> wrote: >> >> Just my 2 cents. +1 from me. This is what I suggested a few weeks (or >> months? :)) ago. The only snag is that those who write or edit a wiki >> page should also be convinced they have to add a version tag always. Or >> is there a way to automate that? >> Hannie >> >> op 06-12-13 21:52, Kevin Godby schreef: >> > Hello. >> > >> > There's been a lot of discussion lately about out-of-date wiki pages >> > and how few of them are actually tagged as being out of date. >> > >> > One potential solution to this would be to have tags for each Ubuntu >> > version (e.g., 13.04, 13.10, 14.04). When you create or edit a wiki >> > page, tag it with the Ubuntu version that it's written for (usually >> > the current/latest version). Then we could easily find out of date >> > pages—those pages tagged with earlier Ubuntu versions—so they may be >> > updated, redirected, etc. >> > >> > What do you think? >> > >> > —Kevin >> > >> >> -- >> ubuntu-doc mailing list >> <a href="mailto:ubuntu-doc@lists.ubuntu.com">ubuntu-doc@lists.ubuntu.com</a> >> <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-doc" target="_blank">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-doc</a> > > > > > -- > Jonathan Aquilina > > -- > ubuntu-doc mailing list > <a href="mailto:ubuntu-doc@lists.ubuntu.com">ubuntu-doc@lists.ubuntu.com</a> > <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-doc" target="_blank">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-doc</a> > </blockquote></div> -- Jonathan Aquilina </div>