<div dir="ltr">I have to say from a user experience perspective, having visited links a different color is usually a good idea (especially when looking at something for the first time, as you noted it is often the only way to see where you have been :-) but that's just my two cents. -Corey.<br>
</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Tom Davies <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:tomdavies04@yahoo.co.uk" target="_blank">tomdavies04@yahoo.co.uk</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div style="font-size:10pt;font-family:verdana,helvetica,sans-serif">Hi :)<br>I don't think Matt was saying to drop it. Just that it's another team's decision/accident and not this one's. That does make it more difficult to deal with so i personally would also drop it but if you want to pursue it then Matt's suggestion might be a good move, ie treat it as though t wa a deliberate choice and ask them why they thought it looked better that way. <br>
Regards from <br>Tom :) <br><div><span><br></span></div><div><br><blockquote style="border-left:2px solid rgb(16,16,255);margin-left:5px;margin-top:5px;padding-left:5px"> <div style="font-family:verdana,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:10pt">
<div style="font-family:times new roman,new york,times,serif;font-size:12pt"> <div dir="ltr"> <hr size="1"> <font face="Arial"> <b><span style="font-weight:bold">From:</span></b> Doug Smythies <<a href="mailto:dsmythies@telus.net" target="_blank">dsmythies@telus.net</a>><br>
<b><span style="font-weight:bold">To:</span></b> 'Ubuntu Doc' <<a href="mailto:ubuntu-doc@lists.ubuntu.com" target="_blank">ubuntu-doc@lists.ubuntu.com</a>> <br> <b><span style="font-weight:bold">Sent:</span></b> Friday, 16 August 2013, 15:19<br>
<b><span style="font-weight:bold">Subject:</span></b> RE: visted verses not yet visited hyperlinks in the resulting html pages<br> </font> </div><div><div class="h5"> <div><br><br>On <a href="tel:2013.08.16%2001" value="+12013081601" target="_blank">2013.08.16 01</a>:53 Kevin wrote:<br>
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:55 AM, Matthew East <<a href="mailto:matt@mdke.org" target="_blank">matt@mdke.org</a>> wrote:<br>>> There probably isn't any history to this - almost certainly it was<br>>> done this way because that is the way that the Ubuntu website and<br>
>> other websites based on the standard Ubuntu theme do links, to ensure<br>>> consistency between themes. You could try getting in touch with
the<br>>> Ubuntu web design team to find out why this design decision was taken.<br><br>> Hi, Matt. It looks like that may be the case.<br><br>> Doug, it looks like the <a href="http://ubuntu.com" target="_blank">ubuntu.com</a> stylesheet uses the same colors for<br>
> both unvisited and visited links as well.<br><br>Matt: As always, thanks for chiming in on this one.<br><br>While I really don't like it, I'll drop it.<br><br>... Doug<br><br><br><br>-- <br>ubuntu-doc mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:ubuntu-doc@lists.ubuntu.com" target="_blank">ubuntu-doc@lists.ubuntu.com</a><br><a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-doc" target="_blank">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-doc</a><br>
<br><br></div> </div></div></div> </div> </blockquote></div> </div></div><br>--<br>
ubuntu-doc mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:ubuntu-doc@lists.ubuntu.com">ubuntu-doc@lists.ubuntu.com</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-doc" target="_blank">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-doc</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>------------------------------|<br> || Corey H. Hart <br> || 518-207-7232 <br>------------------------------|
</div>