<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">Hi there<br>
</font><br>
<font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">There has been some
discussion about deleting outdated pages in
help.ubuntu.com/community.<br>
I think that the many outdated pages discourage people to use the
wiki. AND: The lack of a concept for a "page lifecycle" may also
discourage many contributors from updating the pages, as it may
look like a "hopeless" task.<br>
Or did I miss something here?<br>
</font><font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif"><br>
Different concepts are used (version-specific pages, e.g. <a
href="https://help.ubuntu.com/community/InstallLirc/Maverick">https://help.ubuntu.com/community/InstallLirc/Maverick</a>,
or one paragraph per version, e.g.: <a
href="https://help.ubuntu.com/community/AiptekTablet">https://help.ubuntu.com/community/AiptekTablet</a>)</font><br>
<font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif"><br>
I try to make some SUGGESTIONS. To be discussed.<br>
</font><font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif"><br>
SUGGESTION 1: Versioning guidelines.<br>
<br>
Each page...<br>
</font>
<ul>
<li><font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif"> 1a) ...SHOULD be
valid for all Ubuntu releases that are currently documented.
(Avoid version-specific pages).</font></li>
<li><font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">
1b) ...SHOULD NOT mention the Ubuntu version or codename
("Natty") in its pagename.</font></li>
<li><font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">
1c) ...SHOULD contain version icons [to be created] on the
top level, or below each 1st level heading, in order to show
the user for which versions the chapter is valid. </font></li>
<li><font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif"> 1d) ...SHOULD be
generic: If possible, cover all recent Ubuntu versions in the
same text, newest first.</font></li>
<li><font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif"> 1e) ...SHOULD
contain titles referring to the Ubuntu version IF it is
necessary to re-write entire chapters for different versions.
Newest first.<br>
</font></li>
</ul>
<font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif"><br>
SUGGESTION 2: Archiving concept:<br>
</font><font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif"><br>
Any current page should cover the last 1 to 5 Ubuntu releases.
Pages should be <u>cleaned</u> as follows after each LTS (long
term support) release. <br>
<br>
</font><font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">
* 1) Copy the full page content to a new page, append "_v2010"
to its name: "v" means version and 2010 is the year in which the
page was last modified.<br>
* 2) Add an "Archived page" tag [to be created]: "Archived: This
page is archived. It should not be modified. More info..."<br>
* 3) Go back to the original page. Clean its contents: Remove
whatever refers to versions older than the previous LTS version.
In the first line, add a link: "Documentation for older Ubuntu
versions was moved to this [archive page]" [link to mypage_v2010].
(NB if the entire page was outdated, the original page would now
be empty. In this case, it is recommended to tag it either for
deletion, or for expansion)<br>
<br>
</font><font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">This rule would
result in the following "page lifecycle":<br>
- 2012, March: The page covers 11.10 / 11.04 / 10.10 / 10.04 (LTS)<br>
- 2012, April: 12.04 (LTS) arrives. The page covers 5 versions:
12.04 (LTS) / </font><font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">11.10
/ 11.04 / 10.10 / 10.04 (LTS)</font><font face="Helvetica, Arial,
sans-serif">.<br>
- 2012, September: The page is "cleaned" to the last version
(12.04). Contents referring to 11.10, 11.04, 10.10, 10.04 go to
the "archive page".<br>
- Content for new Ubuntu releases is added in 2012-Oct, 2013-Apr,
2013-Oct. Then we start over.</font><br>
<br>
Regards! Manuel<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>