Hi Phil, I'm on holiday at the moment and will answer your email in more detail next week. Regarding the attributions, we are going to do the credits properly in a couple of weeks. The ones there at the moment are just a placeholder (some of the names are just made up even!) Talk to you later, Benjamin <blockquote type="cite">On 3/04/2010 4:02 AM, "Shaun McCance" <<a href="mailto:shaunm@gnome.org">shaunm@gnome.org</a>> wrote: On Fri, 2010-04-02 at 15:44 +0100, Phil Bull wrote: > The second is: Did you really have to fork so ...In a linear book, you usually don't want to put main content behind links to other resources. It works really nicely for help, but not so well for books. There is the question of how much of that content is actually useful to the target reader in something with "Getting Started" in the title. Encrypting files and folders doesn't strike me as a "Getting Started" topic, for example. When there is genuinely useful content that could be shared between this manual and the system docs, I wonder if this could have been handled better by using a format that is designed to handle content reuse with build-time conditional processing. This is going to sound strange coming from me, but here it is: DITA. There are lots of technical solutions for content reuse. I think in this case, though, the problem isn't technical. It's social. -- Shaun -- ubuntu-doc mailing list <a href="mailto:ubuntu-doc@lists.ubuntu.com">ubuntu-doc@lists.ubuntu.com</a> <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo.">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo.</a>.. </blockquote>