Hi Matthew, <div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 8:05 AM, Matthew East <<a href="mailto:mdke@ubuntu.com">mdke@ubuntu.com</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> Hi, At our recent meeting we decided to change the project's Launchpad structure slightly, so that each flavour of the documentation (ubuntu-docs, kubuntu-docs, xubuntu-docs and edubuntu-docs) would have its own project on Launchpad, with all four of the projects part of an "project group". We decided that the setup and team management of the projects should be identical for each, and the releases and official branch structure should be identical. This will be a trial for 6 months and we can reassess the position after that. <a href="https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs/DocTeam/May2009" target="_blank">https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs/DocTeam/May2009</a> We need to push forward and implement that decision, but I'd like to raise a quick issue before doing that. The structure of Launchpad groups that I'd like to implement is as follows: - ubuntu-doc-project - ubuntu-docs - kubuntu-docs - xubuntu-docs - edubuntu-docs The potential disadvantage of this that I can see is that links to the old "ubuntu-doc" project pages will break. We'll have to fix those links (for example, in the package descriptions and in our wiki pages). However, I think that using something like "ubuntu-doc-project" rather than "ubuntu-doc" for the project group is clearer and avoids a confusing distinction between urls with "ubuntu-doc" and "ubuntu-docs" in them. Any objections to that? Can anyone see any problems that I've missed? </blockquote><div> Thanks. I have no objections to this. I do like the idea of having the location for bug reports identified as "ubuntu-doc-project," which is as you have indicated. I think that will make things clearer for those wishing to file bugs. Jim </div></div>