Hi there. I initially wrote my guide with Amaranth and posted it on the ubuntu forums here: <a href="http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=263851">http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=263851</a> Keeping it regularly updated, i also ported it to the USDF: <a href="http://doc.gwos.org/index.php/BerylOnEdgy">http://doc.gwos.org/index.php/BerylOnEdgy</a> and then the Ubuntu wiki: <a href="https://wiki.ubuntu.com/CompositeManager/InstallingBerylonEdgy#preview">https://wiki.ubuntu.com/CompositeManager/InstallingBerylonEdgy#preview </a> ATI and Intel sections were added to the USDF guide, but didn't immediately appear in the ubuntu wiki version. Amaranth approached me on irc asking to update the wiki entry with the new sections. He also requested that the binary .run method for installing the nvidia drivers be removed. I asked him to either keep that section intact, or mention that a more complete guide was availiable on the USDF and to provide a link. We both agreed on these terms. Amaranth proceeded create the new wiki entry here: <a href="https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BerylOnEdgy">https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BerylOnEdgy</a> correcting my poor grammar and generally cleaning it up a bit. However, he did not follow my request to leave the alternative nvidia driver install and so i added it back in. He then regularly removed this entry for me to revert back, eventually deciding to delete it completely several times. I know that there or arguments for and against the use of his packages over the binary drivers, and i wish to sum them up here: For Amaranth's packages. Allows the user to keep l-r-m for wireless cards etc. (although somehow i still have them too) Will be regularly updated and the user shouldn't have to worry. For the binary nvidia .run: The use KNOWS what he is installing, wheras with the packages you have to trust the unsigned packages to be non-harmful and built well. In the event of the kernel upgrade, the user can simply re-run the file to recompile the module, wheras those using amaranth's packages may have to wait a while for him to rebuild. Both ways may therefore be considered unsafe but i feel that they should both be included to give the user a choice. PriceChild