I have written a draft for the Reporting Bugs guide

[Alberto Salvia Novella]

Gustavo Silva:
> Please, do it right this time.

Seems legit, except because that degree of agreement doesn't seem possible.

Just see the latest email from J, for example. He basically suggested 
that everything is wrong, half of which was already like that in the 
original guide.

If I had to deal with that I would spend months just for one page, and 
he finally would disagree. That's the kind of criticism I receive 100% 
of time when I bring any suggestion of change to the table, and in fact 
in this topic people have been more peaceful than usual (which I greatly 
appreciate).

Also understand that 95% contributors won't have the degree of 
persistence I have on dealing with conflict. They would simply give up. 
That's the part that really worries me, not that people disagree with me 
in particular but that I see newbies having to deal with that crap and 
everyone agreeing it's cool.

So tell me Gustavo, how would you deal with these disagreements?