Current wiki access status

[Chris Perry]

People have raised/recapped some interesting points about the wiki -
but my main concern is to allow access to it again. The proposed
method sounds ok to me. popey needs to create the team? We announce
the team's existence and how to join it? We need at least one
moderator to vet applicants? I'm imagining that it won't be worth a
spammer's effort to make even a moderately plausible application to
join, so anyone who makes a moderately plausible application can be
allowed to join?


On 9 June 2016 at 23:47, Elizabeth K. Joseph <lyz at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Gunnar Hjalmarsson <gunnarhj at ubuntu.com> wrote:
>> I can't help thinking of a consequence of this, which hasn't been
>> mentioned yet. The community help wiki is huge, and one well known
>> problem is that it contains a lot of outdated information.
>
...
>
> I believe in the tagging system. I think it's OK to keep old
> documentation around until someone comes along to update it as long as
> we mark it as such.
>
> --
> Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph || Lyz || pleia2
>
> --
> ubuntu-doc mailing list
> ubuntu-doc at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-doc