Proofreading

Hannie Dumoleyn lafeber-dumoleyn2 at zonnet.nl
Fri Feb 27 10:19:33 UTC 2015


Op 26-02-15 om 18:06 schreef Kevin Godby:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Hannie Dumoleyn
> <lafeber-dumoleyn2 at zonnet.nl> wrote:
>> Having read all your reactions I also want to give my opinion on this. I
>> agree with Stephen that there is a difference between applications (any
>> program on our desktop/laptop) and apps (small programs written for
>> smartphones and tablets). It is a pity that people start using these words
>> interchangeably, it impoverishes a language.
>> Since the Ubuntu documentation is written for desktop users, I personally
>> would prefer to only use the word "application". But if the team think it is
>> ok to use both words interchangeably, I will not insist.
> I'd suggest using 'applications' as 'apps' started out as an informal
> term. If, however, 'apps' is used in the UI, then you should use it so
> the documentation and UI matches.
>
> —Kevin
>
Ok, I did some testing. I entered the word "application" in the gui 
module "Unity", see [1]. There were 10 results, e.g.
Do you want to force the application to exit
Key to start the Launcher Application Switcher
Scroll Inactive Icon to Focus Application
So, this is also a good argument to go for the word "Application" in 
Ubuntu docs.
I also disagree with Alberto's statement "It just doesn't matter". To me 
it matters and I hope to other team members too.
So, my final question is: should I change the word app to application 
wherever I find it in Vivid?
Hannie

[1] 
https://translations.launchpad.net/ubuntu/vivid/+source/unity/+pots/unity/nl/+translate?batch=10&show=all&search=application



More information about the ubuntu-doc mailing list