[wiki] PopularPages - recommended update to F page

[Tom Davies]

Hi :)
Both mean much the same thing.  "Unsupported" has the advantage of being
just 1 word and less geeky.  Anyway i'm sure they had a good debate about
it and i think it's good practice to respect their decision.  I kinda like
eol a lot too but i think "unsupported" is clearer to non-IT people.
Regards from
Tom :)


On 26 April 2014 15:09, Leigh Tate <leigh.tate at linuxmail.org> wrote:

>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: Jonathan Aquilina
>
> Sent: 04/26/14 08:58 AM
>
> To: Leigh Tate
>
> Subject: Re: [wiki] PopularPages - recommended update to F page
>
> For the versions which have been shelved wouldnt End of life be better
> term?
>
> --
> Jonathan Aquilina
>
>
>
> Jonathan, it probably would. I can't recall why we decided to name the
> section "unsupported." Perhaps Geoff or David remembers, and can pop in
> with their opinion on renaming it.
>
>
>
> Leigh
>
> --
> ubuntu-doc mailing list
> ubuntu-doc at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-doc
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-doc/attachments/20140426/0a02cb03/attachment.html>