Unsupported Wiki Page Suggested Format (Idea)

Tom Davies tomdavies04 at yahoo.co.uk
Wed Sep 25 10:57:21 UTC 2013


Hi :)
Sounds like we all kinda agree then.  Except some of us want to move legacy pages and others of us don't.  Both sides have merit, of course.  
Regards from
Tom :)  





________________________________
 From: Svetlana Belkin <barsookmud at yahoo.com>
To: Tom Davies <tomdavies04 at yahoo.co.uk>; "ubuntu-doc at lists.ubuntu.com" <ubuntu-doc at lists.ubuntu.com> 
Sent: Wednesday, 25 September 2013, 0:21
Subject: Re: Unsupported Wiki Page Suggested Format (Idea)
 

On 09/24/2013 03:45 PM, Tom Davies wrote:

I'm writing this on the behalf of Jonathan Aquilina
(eagles051387 at gmail.com).

<start of reply>

> Of course there are some pages that would be
> far tooo long that way and might be better as 2 separate pages, perhaps
> the older one being a sub-page.  Sometimes it might be largely the same
> for both pre and post but with 1 big difference or lots of tiny slight
> changes.

I didn't think of that, but I think your idea will be used for those
pages that require a sub-page for the tiny slight changes as you said.

>  So i am not sure a "1 size fits all" would really fit but i
> suspect that this idea does fit a large number of the pages and is a
> good idea for those. 

Yeah, I was thinking of mainly the pre and post Unity changes.

<end of reply>

Jonathan Aquilina was also thinking of migrating the the unsupported
stuff to a section for unsupported versions.  He also said, "reason im
suggesting this is that im sure somewhere there will be people who
havent updated to the latest LTS for one reason or another".

Svetlana Belkin
-- 
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/belkinsa
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-doc/attachments/20130925/28c44b90/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the ubuntu-doc mailing list