Suggestion (Re to Jonathan Aquilina)

[Tom Davies]

Hi :)
+1
I thought that was one of the crucial points of using tags, that they could be easily removed when no longer relevant. I think we do have to establish the 'obvious' sometimes because several people can easily have very different  (even opposite) ideas about what is obvious.  

The maths professor who on day 1 of the uni course wrote on the board "It is obvious that", then hesitated, stepped back looked long and hard at the board and then walked out.  The next week the students found some assignment waiting for them on the door of the lecture hall.  Again the week after.  On the 4th week the professor was back and firmly wrote on the boards "It IS obvious that ...".  I've always wondered what the next bit was.  
Regards from 
Tom :)  




________________________________
 From: Svetlana Belkin <barsookmud at yahoo.com>
To: Phill Whiteside <PhillW at Ubuntu.com> 
Cc: Benjamin Kerensa <bkerensa at ubuntu.com>; "ubuntu-doc at lists.ubuntu.com" <ubuntu-doc at lists.ubuntu.com> 
Sent: Tuesday, 17 September 2013, 15:42
Subject: Re: Suggestion (Re to Jonathan Aquilina)
 

On 09/17/2013 09:57 AM, Phill Whiteside wrote:
> If someone edits a wiki page that is tagged 'unsupported version' and it
> then holds supported versions as well, that tag can then be removed.  
> If someone edits a wiki page that is tagged 'needs updating' and it then
> holds the latest release notes as well, that tag can then be removed.
> 
> Is my logic okay with everyone?

I think your logic works.

Svetlana Belkin

-- 
ubuntu-doc mailing list
ubuntu-doc at lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-doc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-doc/attachments/20130918/a410a52d/attachment.html>