Suggestion

[Jonathan Aquilina]

Cant this be scripted in a way


On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Tom Davies <tomdavies04 at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

> Hi :)
> That's where it gets tricky.  It means every single page would need to be
> updated every 6months otherwise it looks out-dated even if it is still
> current.  It's why very few web-sites give a date.  It just creates a lot
> more work per cycle without really giving much benefit.
>
> I think the tags work.
> Regards from
> Tom :)
>
>
>
>   ------------------------------
>  *From:* Hannie Dumoleyn <lafeber-dumoleyn2 at zonnet.nl>
> *To:* ubuntu-doc at lists.ubuntu.com
> *Sent:* Saturday, 14 September 2013, 8:21
> *Subject:* Re: Suggestion
>
> Hi Phill,
> I really like this tagging system. This example of yours illustrates it
> very well.
> I wonder if it would be possible to mention at the top of every wiki
> page what version(s) of Ubuntu it is (re)written for.
> Hannie
>
> Op 13-09-13 22:12, Phill Whiteside schreef:
> > Hi Jonathan,
> >
> > yes, the tags show up at the top of the page. As I'm now going to
> > spend more time on wiki / docs, I will be tagging pages up. An example
> > of this can be seen via http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2169566
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Phill.
> >
> >
>
> --
> ubuntu-doc mailing list
> ubuntu-doc at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-doc
>
>
>
> --
> ubuntu-doc mailing list
> ubuntu-doc at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-doc
>
>


-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-doc/attachments/20130915/c2fb65d5/attachment-0001.html>