icons

[Phill Whiteside]

Hi Tom,

I did consider splitting the page, but I worry that this would break any
pages already using the icons. Being a 'library' page and not textural
instructions, I believe that using the contents section is sufficient to
'break it down' into managable sections. As it grows, it is quite possible
that it will need work doing on the contents section I'll see how it grows!

Regards,

Phill.


On 15 September 2013 16:10, Tom Davies <tomdavies04 at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

> Hi :)
> I think it would be great if the artwork team got involved later but it
> might be easier for 1 person to complete this current task.  I think it
> should be up to Phill to decide how soon would be best.
>
> If the page length is a bit of a problem might it be better to split into
> sub-pages such as
>
> File-system operations  (folder icons as well as "save as" and stuff)
> Networking
> Hardware
> Programs
>
> But keep it to less than 6 headings.  Hopefully the 4 i suggested might be
> plenty?
>
> With things like this i worry a bit that the more people involved the
> longer it takes to make decisions.  Right now we seem to have "a man with a
> plan" and letting him complete is likely to be the fastest route to get the
> job done.  Also discussing it on this list rather than the art work mailing
> list seems a bit cheeky.  They might already have a plan too or at least a
> better idea than me.
>
> So, on reflection, i think it would be better to move this discussion to
> the art-work mailing list but basically let Phill get on with it and ignore
> my suggestions.
> Regards from
> Tom :)
>
>
>   ------------------------------
>  *From:* Ali Linx (amjjawad) <amjjawad at gmail.com>
> *To:* Phill Whiteside <PhillW at ubuntu.com>
> *Cc:* "Team, Ubuntu" <ubuntu-doc at lists.ubuntu.com>
> *Sent:* Sunday, 15 September 2013, 15:15
> *Subject:* Re: icons
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 3:23 AM, Phill Whiteside <PhillW at ubuntu.com>wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm going for about 10% chance of success here.. what do you good people
> reckon my chances of getting the various teams to use the icons page[1]?
> I'm thinking 14.04. Do please tell me if I have no chance!! Splitting the
> current contents page (which I've just done) and then into sub sections
> that are flavour specific. It will be one heck of a long page, and break
> our 'not too long' wiki page rule, but the links for the graphics must be
> stable and not change.
>
> Regards,
>
> Phill.
> 1. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/IconsPage
>
> --
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
>
>
> Hi Phill,
>
> When our Artwork Team Leader (Alfredo) have some time, I will ask him to
> add our Artwork Icons [1] to the IconsPage :)
>
> Until then, feel free to use that.
>
> Hmm, how about we can include this [1] as a link on:
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/IconsPage ???
> It would SAVE time for everyone. Instead of re-uploading everything again
> to the IconPage, it is already uploaded on [1] and no need to re-upload.
> But, adding a Link is much more easier and save time. Just a thought :)
>
> But yes, I agree that that page (IconPage) needs to be used more often.
>
>  [1] - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuGNOME/Artwork/Graphics
>
> --
> Remember: "All of us are smarter than any one of us."
> Best Regards,
> amjjawad <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/amjjawad>
> Areas of Involvement <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/amjjawad/AreasOfInvolvement>
> My Projects <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/amjjawad/Projects>
>
>


-- 
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-doc/attachments/20130915/ff33364d/attachment.html>