icons

[Phill Whiteside]

People did not,

they would simply upload an icon to a page instead of using the library.
This means that people are taking time to re-invent the wheel instead of
just using the link. I'm not sure why this resource has become depreciated,
but with the resources there and the support from art work teams to get it
up dated I do honestly think it is worth the time I'm prepared to put into
it. Would that give success? I do not know. I'm still on "light duties",
but as this work is for 14.04; I reckon I'll be up for it.

Regards,

Phill.


On 13 September 2013 00:34, Mauricio Tavares <raubvogel at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Phill Whiteside <PhillW at ubuntu.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm going for about 10% chance of success here.. what do you good people
> > reckon my chances of getting the various teams to use the icons page[1]?
> I'm
> > thinking 14.04. Do please tell me if I have no chance!! Splitting the
> > current contents page (which I've just done) and then into sub sections
> that
> > are flavour specific. It will be one heck of a long page, and break our
> 'not
> > too long' wiki page rule, but the links for the graphics must be stable
> and
> > not change.
> >
>       I am game myself; I did not even know it was there.
>
> > Regards,
> >
> > Phill.
> > 1. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/IconsPage
> >
> > --
> > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
> >
> > --
> > ubuntu-doc mailing list
> > ubuntu-doc at lists.ubuntu.com
> > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-doc
> >
>
> --
> ubuntu-doc mailing list
> ubuntu-doc at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-doc
>



-- 
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-doc/attachments/20130913/2877067a/attachment.html>