One set of documentation needs to go

[Phill Whiteside]

Peter,

may be it is because they are separate mailing lists? That is why I sent my
suggestion to three teams.. My cc to ubuntu-server still awaits approval
for them to be brought into this conversation.

It is precisely because several people new to docs knew or would understand
that call, that I issued the call to join ranks and just 'get on with it'.
I'd have no idea of how to help as I'm a wiki based person. Others would
like to help but there is still confusing instructions. Do we choose and
learn what ever docs uses or use what ever manual uses.... a.k.a..... get
your acts together and agree on one system :)

Agree a standard!!!!!!


Regards,

Phill.


On 9 October 2013 00:05, Peter Matulis <peter.matulis at canonical.com> wrote:

> On 10/08/2013 11:39 AM, Peter Matulis wrote:
> > On 10/08/2013 10:09 AM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> >> It is nice to see others just as confused about the documentation and
> >> differences between the community and official docs.
>
> > Having official documentation and community documentation living in
> > isolation  squanders our resources and, like you said, creates
> > confusion, and frustration I might add, within the userbase.  It also
> > does not give a good impression to enterprise users.
>
> And no idea why we also need the "Ubuntu Manual".  See thread in this list:
>
> 'Fwd: [Ubuntu-manual] Public proofreading phase'
>
> ~pmatulis
>
>
> --
> ubuntu-doc mailing list
> ubuntu-doc at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-doc
>
> --
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
> <https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-doc>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-doc/attachments/20131009/e477910b/attachment.html>