A Though on Redundancy of Community Wiki and Other Forms of Support
Peter Matulis
peter.matulis at canonical.com
Tue Dec 3 01:18:05 UTC 2013
On 12/01/2013 10:44 AM, Svetlana Belkin wrote:
> All,
>
> Just a thought on the Community Wiki, one that I will say no offence to,
> if this will hurt someone's feelings. Why is there major redundancy
> with the various formats of documentation/support that we have? This
> includes AskUbuntu and the forums. Well, mainly with AskUbuntu. It
> seems that most users who need support will go to AskUbuntu without
> first looking in the Community Wiki, at least what I see when I pop in
> and out of AskUbuntu.
>
> I understand why we still have the Community Wiki (or I don't), but in
> it's current state, it's not effective. Or it's because AskUbuntu was
> added later on for the ease of support.
>
> It's either we need to figure out what what users want from the Ubuntu
> Community Wiki via a survey or we, as a team, could work activity and
> clean it up so it's easier to use. Or another solution can be also
> worked out, maybe something on the AskUbuntu site about the Community Wiki.
>
> It might just be me and not understanding why we have redundancy or even
> not having a Community Wiki. I just feel like it *IS NOT* like the
> genetic code where you can have redundancy and it's useful.
Here we go again.
~pmatulis
More information about the ubuntu-doc
mailing list