Quantal Doumentation Freeze

[Phill Whiteside]

I think giving the translations team a firm date with time do the work is
excellent. Freeze exceptions will always occur, but a month gives time for
feature freeze exceptions before the translators heavily commit.

Regards,

Phill.

On 21 May 2012 22:41, Chris Druif <chrisdruif at ubuntu.com> wrote:

> No objection from me. We need to close it some day, might as well be Sept.
> 20th.
>
> With metta, Chris
>
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:15 PM, Kate Stewart <kate.stewart at canonical.com
> > wrote:
>
>>
>> Greetings Docs-Team,
>>   We have been working through the input from UDS-Q, and feedback from
>> translation team, and trying to figure out the best point for the
>> DocumentationStringFreeze [1] for the Quantal cycle.
>>
>>   Based on the input so far,  Sept. 20 looks like the best fit
>> for the Documentation String freeze,  this puts it 1 month after
>> FeatureFreeze, and will still give the translation team some time to
>> get the translations ready by Oct 9th. [2]
>>
>>   Anyone see any issues with making the DocumentationStringFreeze be
>> Sept. 20th?   Other factors that need to be considered?
>>
>> Thanks, Kate
>>
>>
>> [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DocumentationStringFreeze
>> [2] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QuantalQuetzal/ReleaseInterlock
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> ubuntu-doc mailing list
>> ubuntu-doc at lists.ubuntu.com
>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-doc
>>
>
>
> --
> ubuntu-doc mailing list
> ubuntu-doc at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-doc
>
> --
> <https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-doc>
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-doc/attachments/20120521/24db6c5b/attachment.html>