Use of revision tags to track status in gnome-user-docs

[Matthew East]

On 24 April 2011 01:33, Jeremy Bicha <jeremy at bicha.net> wrote:
> Ok, to paraphrase this to make sure it's clear. I'll be marking pages as

I don't think the status options are necessarily set in stone and some
of them seem to me to overlap a bit. Given the short time available, I
suggest that we focus on three in particular, "review", "outdated" and
"final". We might perhaps do something a bit more subtle for

* Outdated - pages which haven't been reviewed for compatibility with
Ubuntu since being written for Gnome.
* Review - new material which needs peer review from another editor.
* Final - ready to go.

Once an outdated document has been reviewed and amended for
compatibility with Ubuntu, mark it as "Final". Once new material has
been reviewed by another editor, mark it as "Final".

If we use too many different status options, and require too many
levels of review, we will get stuck in the time we have available.

-- 
Matthew East
http://www.mdke.org
gnupg pub 1024D/0E6B06FF