Status of Ubuntu Server documentation for 10.04

[Matthew East]

Hi Thierry,

On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Thierry Carrez
<thierry.carrez at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> Adam, Matthew: Adam has been taking care of the Server Guide in previous
> releases, but he doesn't seem to have as much time to coordinate everything
> for this release, so I was wondering if we should just open bugs against
> ubuntu-docs and propose branches for review ?

Yes, that's absolutely fine. Please also tag the bugs with "serverguide".

See my previous post to the same effect here:

https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-doc/2010-February/014359.html

One query I would have is how we should check whether the person
proposing the branch is a trusted member of the server team (i.e. we
can approve a branch on the basis of a check of the style and
language, without worry about whether the technical details of the
content are correct). ~ubuntu-server in Launchpad has a lot of members
(161), so I suspect it might not be appropriate to assume that every
member of that team should have carte blanche in terms of technical
skills? Maybe there is a different Launchpad team which could be used
as a point of reference, or specific individuals in the server team
could be appointed to do technical content review for the server
guide?

Cross posting to ubuntu-doc@ for their input too.

-- 
Matthew East
http://www.mdke.org
gnupg pub 1024D/0E6B06FF